A dominant theme of the national political discourse has been the
crushing spending spree the U.S. has ostensibly embarked on during the
Obama presidency. That argument, ignited by Republicans and picked up by
many elite opinion makers, has infused the national dialogue and shaped
the public debate in nearly every major budget battle of the last thee
years.
But the numbers tell a different story.
The fact that the national debt has risen from $10.6 trillion to
$15.6 trillion under Obama’s watch makes for easy partisan attacks. But
the vast bulk of the increase
was caused by a combination of revenue losses due to the 2008-09
economic downturn as well as Bush-era tax cuts and automatic increases
in safety-net spending that were already written into law.
Obama’s policies, including the much-criticized stimulus package, have caused the slowest increase in federal spending of any president in almost 60 nears, according to data compiled by the financial news service MarketWatch.
The chart shows that Presidents Reagan, both Bushes, and to a lesser
extent Clinton, grew federal spending at a far quicker pace than Obama.
Part of the reason for the slow growth is that Obama — unlike his
Republican and Democratic predecessors — signed a law in February 2010
necessitating that new spending laws are paid for. In addition, Obama
last year signed into law over $2 trillion in debt-reduction over the
next decade.
Republicans argue that safety-net spending has crossed a critical
threshold in recent years and Obama has been unwilling to address it.
The two sides have jousted over who is to blame but the President has
put hundreds of billions in cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social
Security on the table in deals that have been derailed, thanks in no
small part to the GOP’s resistance to raising new tax revenues to help
bridge the budget shortfall.
Last week, Obama’s likely Republican opponent Mitt Romney accused
Obama of lighting a “prairie fire” of spending and said he “added almost
as much debt as all the prior presidents combined.”
Chart by TPM’s Clayton Ashley
No comments:
Post a Comment