Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Judicial Watch Announces List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007

Washington, DC Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2007 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:


1. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY): In addition to her long and sordid ethics record, Senator Hillary Clinton took a lot of heat in 2007 – and rightly so – for blocking the release her official White House records. Many suspect these records contain a treasure trove of information related to her role in a number of serious Clinton-era scandals. Moreover, in March 2007, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Senator Clinton for filing false financial disclosure forms with the U.S. Senate (again). And Hillary’s top campaign contributor, Norman Hsu, was exposed as a felon and a fugitive from justice in 2007. Hsu pleaded guilt to one count of grand theft for defrauding investors as part of a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme.


2. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI): Conyers reportedly repeatedly violated the law and House ethics rules, forcing his staff to serve as his personal servants, babysitters, valets and campaign workers while on the government payroll. While the House Ethics Committee investigated these allegations in 2006, and substantiated a number of the accusations against Conyers, the committee blamed the staff and required additional administrative record-keeping and employee training. Judicial Watch obtained documentation in 2007 from a former Conyers staffer that sheds new light on the activities and conduct on the part of the Michigan congressman, which appear to be at a minimum inappropriate and likely unlawful. Judicial Watch called on the Attorney General in 2007 to investigate the matter.


3. Senator Larry Craig (R-ID): In one of the most shocking scandals of 2007, Senator Craig was caught by police attempting to solicit sex in a Minneapolis International Airport men’s bathroom during the summer. Senator Craig reportedly “sent signals” to a police officer in an adjacent stall that he wanted to engage in sexual activity. When the police officer showed Craig his police identification under the bathroom stall divider and pointed toward the exit, the senator reportedly exclaimed 'No!'” When asked to produce identification, Craig presented police his U.S. Senate business card and said, “What do you think of that?” The power play didn’t work. Craig was arrested, charged and entered a guilty plea. Despite enormous pressure from his Republican colleagues to resign from the Senate, Craig refused.


4. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA): As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee's subcommittee on military construction, Feinstein reviewed military construction government contracts, some of which were ultimately awarded to URS Corporation and Perini, companies then owned by Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum. While the Pentagon ultimately awards military contracts, there is a reason for the review process. The Senate's subcommittee on Military Construction's approval carries weight. Sen. Feinstein, therefore, likely had influence over the decision making process. Senator Feinstein also attempted to undermine ethics reform in 2007, arguing in favor of a perk that allows members of Congress to book multiple airline flights and then cancel them without financial penalty. Judicial Watch’s investigation into this matter is ongoing.


5. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R-NY): Giuliani came under fire in late 2007 after it was discovered the former New York mayor’s office “billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital relationship with future wife Judith Nathan in the Hamptons…” ABC News also reported that Giuliani provided Nathan with a police vehicle and a city driver at taxpayer expense. All of this news came on the heels of the federal indictment on corruption charges of Giuliani’s former Police Chief and business partner Bernard Kerik, who pleaded guilty in 2006 to accepting a $165,000 bribe in the form of renovations to his Bronx apartment from a construction company attempting to land city contracts.


6. Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR): Governor Huckabee enjoyed a meteoric rise in the polls in December 2007, which prompted a more thorough review of his ethics record. According to The Associated Press: “[Huckabee’s] career has also been colored by 14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity, ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files on his way out of the governor’s office.” And what was Governor Huckabee’s response to these ethics allegations? Rather than cooperating with investigators, Huckabee sued the state ethics commission twice and attempted to shut the ethics process down.


7. I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby: Libby, former Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, was sentenced to 30 months in prison and fined $250,000 for lying and obstructing the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation. Libby was found guilty of four felonies -- two counts of perjury, one count of making false statements to the FBI and one count of obstructing justice – all serious crimes. Unfortunately, Libby was largely let off the hook. In an appalling lack of judgment, President Bush issued “Executive Clemency” to Libby and commuted the sentence.


8. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL): A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.


9. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who promised a new era of ethics enforcement in the House of Representatives, snuck a $25 million gift to her husband, Paul Pelosi, in a $15 billion Water Resources Development Act recently passed by Congress. The pet project involved renovating ports in Speaker Pelosi's home base of San Francisco. Pelosi just happens to own apartment buildings near the areas targeted for improvement, and will almost certainly experience a significant boost in property value as a result of Pelosi's earmark. Earlier in the year, Pelosi found herself in hot water for demanding access to a luxury Air Force jet to ferry the Speaker and her entourage back and forth from San Francisco non-stop, in unprecedented request which was wisely rejected by the Pentagon. And under Pelosi’s leadership, the House ethics process remains essentially shut down – which protects members in both parties from accountability.


10. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV): Over the last few years, Reid has been embroiled in a series of scandals that cast serious doubt on his credibility as a self-professed champion of government ethics, and 2007 was no different. According to The Los Angeles Times, over the last four years, Reid has used his influence in Washington to help a developer, Havey Whittemore, clear obstacles for a profitable real estate deal. As the project advanced, the Times reported, “Reid received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Whittemore.” Whittemore also hired one of Reid’s sons (Leif) as his personal lawyer and then promptly handed the junior Reid the responsibility of negotiating the real estate deal with federal officials. Leif Reid even called his father’s office to talk about how to obtain the proper EPA permits, a clear conflict of interest.

**************************

Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2006

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2006 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:

1. Jack Abramoff, Former Lobbyist – Abramoff is at the center of a massive public corruption investigation by the Department of Justice that, in the end, could involve as many as a dozen members of Congress. Abramoff pleaded guilty to conspiracy, fraud and a host of other charges on January 3, 2006, and was sent to prison in November to serve a five-year, 10-month sentence for defrauding banks of $23 million in Florida in 2000.

2. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) – In January 2006, Hillary Clinton’s fundraising operation was fined $35,000 by the Federal Election Commission for failing to accurately report more than $700,000 in contributions to Clinton’s Senate 2000 campaign. New information also surfaced in 2006 raising more questions about Hillary and her brother Anthony Rodham’s connection to the Clinton Pardongate scandal, where presidential pardons were allegedly traded in exchange for cash and other favors.

3. Former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-CA) – In November 2005, Cunningham pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud, wire fraud, and tax evasion. He was sentenced to 8 years, four months in prison and ordered to pay $1.8 million in restitution in March 2006.

4. Former Rep. Tom Delay (R-TX) – Tom DeLay, who was forced to step down from his position as House Majority Leader and then resign from Congress, decided in 2006 not to run for re-election. Congressman DeLay has been embroiled in a series of scandals from bribery to influence peddling, and was indicted twice by grand juries in Texas.

5. Former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) – Foley left the House in disgrace after news broke that he had been sending predatory homosexual emails to a House page. A recent House Ethics Committee report indicated that Republican leaders knew about Foley’s dangerous behavior, but failed to take action. Democrats, meanwhile, shopped the story to the press to influence the elections. Outrageously, the Committee recommended no punishment for those involved.

6. Rep. Denny Hastert (R-IL) – In addition to mishandling the Foley scandal, outgoing House Speaker Dennis Hastert allowed House ethics process to grind to a halt on his watch. Gary Condit, Cynthia McKinney, William Jefferson, John Conyers, Tom Delay, Duke Cunningham, Jim McDermott, Patrick Kennedy are examples of alleged wrongdoers who faced little-to-no ethics enforcement in the House.

7. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) – Hastings is one of only six federal judges to be removed from office through impeachment and has accumulated staggering liabilities ranging from $2,130,006 to $7,350,000. Hastings was “next in line” for Chairmanship of the House Select Committee on Intelligence until a wave of protest forced Nancy Pelosi to select another candidate. Nonetheless, Hastings is expected to continue to serve on the Intelligence Committee.

8. Rep. William “Dollar Bill” Jefferson (D-LA) – Jefferson is alleged to have accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to help broker high-tech business deals in Nigeria. According to press reports, he was also caught on tape discussing the deals, while an FBI search of his home uncovered $90,000 in cash stuffed in his freezer.

9. Former Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) – Ohio Republican Congressman Bob Ney resigned in early November 2006, three weeks after pleading guilty for accepting bribes from an Indian casino in exchange for legislative favors. Ney was the first congressman to be convicted of a crime in the web of scandals involving former lobbyist Jack Abramoff and is expected to serve a jail sentence.

10. Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) – Senator Reid came under fire in 2006 for failing to properly report to Congress a $700,000 land deal. Reid also accepted more than $30,000 of Abramoff-tainted money allegedly in return for his ''cooperation'' in matters related Nevada Indian gaming.

1 comment:

Criminaljustice said...

HERE IS SOME REAL PUBLIC CORRUPTION , I'M OPEN FOR SUJESTIONS......E-MAIL ME!
>
>
> kansas.city@ic.fbi.gov
> Category: Web, HTML, Tech
>
> FBI CONTACTED (2004)
>
> TAKEN FROM THE FBI WEB SITE!
>
> Public corruption is one of the FBI's top investigative
> priorities—behind only terrorism, espionage, and cyber
> crimes. Why? Because of its impact on our democracy and
> national security. Public corruption can affect everything
> from how well our borders are secured and our neighborhoods
> protected…to verdicts handed down in courts…to the
> quality of our roads and schools. And it takes a significant
> toll on our pocketbooks, too, siphoning off tax dollars.
> Learn more here about our national program and local
> investigations.
>
> Please contact us if you come across evidence of public
> corruption activities:
> Pointer Arrow Submit an Online Tip
>
>
> FBI.gov is an official site of the U.S. Federal Government,
> U.S. Department of Justice.
>
>
> MY PHONE RECORDS PROVE AN HOUR LONG CONVERSATION W/ THE
> KANSAS CITY, MO FBI FIELD OFFICE EXPLAINING -----ILLEGAL
> CONVICTIONS AND INCARCERATIONS IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> KANSAS.....TO DATE THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE CONTINUING
> BUISNESS AS USUAL.....
>
> JOHN WACKER----FALSLEY IMPRISONED FOR FILING DOCUMENTS IN
> THE COURTS CONTRARY TO ELLSWORTH COUNTY, KANSAS
> OFFICIALS....HIS FEDERAL PAROLE WAS VIOLATED AS DIRECT
> RESULT OF THESE FILINGS!
>
> TERI LYNN CHAMPMAN - FALSLEY IMPRISONED FOR TYPING AND
> MAILING LEGAL DOCUMENTS TO THE US DISTRICT COURT
> KANSAS.CONTRARY TO ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS...LOCKED IN
> SINGLE CELL WITH NO OUT OF CELL RECREATION, T.V.
> RADIO.....OR OTHER FEMALE COMMUNICATION AND COERCED TO PLEAD
> GUILTY TO CHARGES SHE WAS NOT GUILTY OF.
>
> CRAIG I. GILBERT.....FALSLY IMPRISONED IN VIOLATION OF
> FEDERAL LAWS ........ILLEGEGALLY IMPRISONED UPON PAROLE FOR
> FILING FEDERAL DOCUMENTS CONTRARY TO ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> OFFICIALS. ELLSWORTH KANSAS.....THE FBI HAS NOT RESOLVED
> THESE MATTERS AND THERE IS NO LEGAL RECOURSE..AS NO ATTORNEY
> IN THE UNITED STATES WILL TAKE THE CASE........UNITED STATES
> DISTRICT ATTORNEY OR OTHER.
>
> JUL11, 2003 I WAS SCHEDULED TO PAROLE FROM THE KANSAS
> DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AFTER SERVING AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE
> IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a) ------ I WAS DETAINED (NOT
> PAROLED) DO TO AN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DETAINER I MAY ADD - I
> HAD SPENT 17 MONTHS IN SOLITARY CONFINMENT IN ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY, KANSAS FOR FILING A LAW SUIT AGAINST ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY OFFICIALS AND COERCED TO PLEAD GUILLTY TO ILLEGAL
> CHARGES TO ESCAPE MY SOLITARY CONFINMENT AND TO AVOID A
> MALICOUS PROSECUTION IN A JUDICIAL SYSTEM ---- THAT HAS NO
> ETHICS.
>
> IN MAY 2001 - I, CRAIG I. GILBERT WAS SENTENCED TO PRISON
> IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS...I WAS NEVER TRANSFERED TO
> PRISON I WAS TRANSFERED TO ANOTHER JAIL WERE I WAS ONCE
> AGAIN MALICOUSLY PROSECUTED BY A McPHERSON COUNTY JUDGE WHO
> UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW WAS RECUSSED FROM THE CASE DO
> THE FACT HE WAS THE ARRESTING OFFICER AS HE ISSUED THE
> WARRANT W/OUT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FILING CHARGES......I
> WAS TOLD IF I PLEAD GUILTY I WOULD BE RELEASED AND IT WOULD
> RUN CONCURRENT W/ THWE ELLSWORTH COUNTY SENTENCE ANOTHER
> ILLEGAL SENTENCE IN VIOPLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a).
>
> I NEVER RECEIVED A CONCURRENT SENTENCE - I RECEIVED AN
> ILLEGAL SENTENCE.......AND THE FBI WAS WELL INFORMED.
>
> I WAS ORDERED TO SERVE TIME IN PRISON...AGAIN I WAS NOT
> TRANSFERED TO PRISON..... I WAS TRANSFERED TO ANOTHER COUNTY
> JAIL AND CHARGED W/ ANOTHER BULLSHIT FELONY- GIVING OF A
> WORTHLESS CHECK, FOR THE RECORD MY ATTORNEY IN SALINA,
> KANSAS WITHDREW FROM THE CASE UPON EVIDENCE THE ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY OFFICIALS HAD CONTACTED MY FINANCIAL INSTITUTION -
> THE SAME DAY I WROTE A CHECK TO PAY FOR BUSINESS ADVERTISING
> ON A CHARGE ACCOUNT -- MEANING I DID NOT GIVE A CHECK TO
> ANYONE TO RECEIVE ANYTHING I WAS PAYING MY CHARGE
> ACCOUNT...........STUPID PUBLIC OFFICIALS - U WOULD REALLY
> HAVE THOUGHT A LITTLE QUESTIONING PRIOR TO CHARGES WOULD
> HAVE REVEALED THIS...............FACT IS THEY KNEW.....AND
> THEY PROCEDED ---- WASTING TAX PAYER
> MONEY................... I KNOW HOW TO FIX THE
> ECONOMY.......I COULD FIX KANSAS ECONOMY QUICK ----
>
> CHARGE ALL THESE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S - PUBLIC
> DEFENDERS - AND JUDGES IN A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
> ------------- INVESTIGATE EVERY CASE THEY EVER FILED - AND U
> WOULD SEE A REAL CLEAR PICTURE WHAT I'M SAYING IN CLEAR
> LANGUAGE......KANSAS AND SO MANY OTHER STATES ILLEGALLY
> IMPRISONED THE PEOPLE WHO PAY YOUR CHECKS..........THE
> ECOMOMY!
>
> ONE DAY I WAS MYSTERIOUSLY RELEASED FROM CUSTODY AFTER
> BEING SENTENCED TO PRISON, IN TWO SEPERATE COUNTIES AND A
> THIRD HOLD IN DODGE CITY, KANSAS.
>
> I WAS SUPPOSE TO RUN, AS ALL OF THIS WAS BECOMING A -BIG
> FAT FUCKING MESS.........
>
> I DID NOT RUN I SPENT THE NEXT FOURTY FIVE DAYS PREPAIRING
> A LAW SUIT!
>
> I WAS RE ARRESTED 45 DAYS LATER IN OPEN COURT IN SALINA
> KANSAS.
>
> I WAS EVENTUALLY SENT TO PRISON NOT BY McPHERSON COUNTY
> SHERIFF PERSONEL NOR ELLSWORTH COUNTY PERSONEL RESPONSIBLE
> FOR TRANSPORTING ME UPON SENTENCING, RATHER BY DFORD COUNTY
> OFFICIAL SOME 10 MONTHS AFTER SBEING SENTENCED TO PRISON,
> FOR U OF LITTLE AND WEAK MINDS THIS IS CRUEL AND UNUSAL
> PUNISHMENT IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHT AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED
> STATES CONSTITUTION SPENDING MORE THAN TWO YEARS IN COUNTY
> JAILS........BECAUSE THE STATE WANTED TO BREAK ME FROM
> FILING LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN COURTS.....BECAUSE EVERYTHING THEY
> WERE DOING IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
>
> IN JULY 2003 JOE SCHEPACK THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS
> DISTRICT ATTORNEY ISSUED A DETAINER ---- I HAD TO FILE A
> LAWSUIT SEE: US DISTRICT COURT TOPEKA, KANSAS
>
> CRAIG I. GILBERT VS BARRY A BENNINGTON (JUDGE) ET AL.
>
> IT WAS AGAINST THE COUNTY OF ELLSWORTH, KANSAS.........ALL
> PUBLIC OFFICALS...IT STATES THE REASONS ON THE FACE OF THE
> PETITION.
>
> THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOE SCHEPACK FILED
> AND SIGNED A DOCUMENT IN THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
> STATING:
>
> MR GILBERT VIOLATED THE CONDITIONS OF HIS PLEA AGREEMENT BY
> FILING A LAW SUIT, AN APPEAL AND A PETITION FOR WRIT OF
> HABEAS CORPUS.
>
> SEE:
>
> THE FEDERAL COURT ORDER AND EXHIBITS FILED IN KANSAS CITY,
> KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -- ORDER OF AUGUST 2003
> SIGNED BY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GT
> VANBEBBER.....ORDERING THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY PROSECUTED! NO-ONE EVER PROSECUTED THIS
> MAN...........
>
> The Amendments OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION!
>
> The following are the Amendments to the Constitution. The
> first ten Amendments collectively are commonly known as the
> Bill of Rights. History
>
> Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression.
> Ratified 12/15/1791. Note
>
> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
> religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
> abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the
> right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
> the Government for a redress of grievances.
>
> THEY HAVE MADE A LAW --- IT IS UNSPOKEN AND PRACTICED IN
> EVERY COURT IN THE UNITED STATES.
>
> THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY, KANSAS DISTICT ATTORNEY JOE SCHEPACK
> IS STILL IN OFFICE AS A DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN STAFFORD
> COUNTY, KANSAS.
>
> EVEN THOUGH THESE ILLEGAL INCARCERATIONS EXIST -- (THERE
> ARE SO MANY) ---- I ONLY LISTED THE THREE MOST EASILY
> PROVED!
>
> I WANT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS BAR LICENSE AND RESIGNATION
> ANY NEWS REPORTERS WANT TO HELP?
>
> I SENT A COPY OF THIS BLOG TO THE FBI AT THE ABOVE E-MAIL
> ADDRES AS POSTED IN THE SUBJECT LINE...........AFTER 4 AND A
> HALF YEARS YOU WOULD BELIEVE THEY WOULD HAVE ARRESTED THE
> RACKETERING INFLUENCED CORUPT DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND THE
> ATTORNEYS THAT HAVE COSPIRED WITH HIM BY NOW.
>
> RICO ACT 18 USC 1962. Prohibited activities
>
> (a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received
> any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern
> of racketeering activity or through collection of an
> unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a
> principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United
> States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any
> part of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in
> acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or
> operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the
> activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.
> A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of
> investment, and without the intention of controlling or
> participating in the control of the issuer, or of assisting
> another to do so, shall not be unlawful under this
> subsection if the securities of the issuer held by the
> purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or
> their accomplices in any pattern or racketeering
> activity or the collection of an unlawful debt after such
> purchase do not amount in the aggregate to one percent of
> the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not
> confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or
> more directors of the issuer.
> (b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern
> of racketeering activity or through collection of an
> unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or
> indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise
> which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect,
> interstate or foreign commerce.
> (c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or
> associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities
> of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct
> or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of
> such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of
> racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.
> (d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to
> violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c)
> of this section.
>
> WHY CAN I NOT GET MY CASE HEARD IN ANY COURT IN THE THE
> UNITED STATES..............I HAVE BEEN IN PLENTY....AND HAVE
> NEVER RECEIVED A PROPER WRITTEN COURT ORDER BY ANY FEDERAL
> OR STATE JUDGE!
>
> WE THE PEOPLE, HAVE WE ALLOWED THESE ELECTED OFFICIALS TO
> DEPRIVE US OF OUR DECLERATION OF INDEPENDENCE SIGNED
> 1776.........YES TIMES DO CHANGE BUT TAKING AWAY OUR FREEDOM
> THRU MALICOUS PROSECUTIONS ------ BREEDS HATRED AND
> DANGEROUS CONTEMPT ------- DETREMINTAL TO YOUR CHILDRENS
> FUTURE...WHEN JUDICIAL OFFICERS AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS
> ARE ALLOWED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO VIOLATE THEIR OWN LAWS AND
> INFLICT PUNISHMENT ON UNITED STATES CITIZENS BASED ON
> CHARACTER (LIKES OR DISLIKES) WE ARE NO-LONGER A FREE
> COUNTRY AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS NULL AND VOID.
> (UN-ENFORCABLE IN ANY COURT OF THE UNITED STATES)
>
> LEGISLATURES HAVE DESINED LAWS TO BLOCK CIVIL FILINGS BY
> POOR INDIVIDUALS THE US CONGRESS HAS ENVOKED A FEDERAL LAW
> CALLED 3 STRIKES .......MEANING WHEN A DETAINED PERSON IN
> CUSTODY FILES A CIVIL PETITION IN ANY COURT OF THE UNITED
> STATES ---- THE COURT SHALL REVIEW THE PETITION TO DETERMINE
> ((2) Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof,
> that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at
> any time if the court determines that—
> (A) the allegation of poverty is untrue; or
> (B) the action or appeal—
> (i) is frivolous or malicious;
> (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted;
> or
> (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is
> immune from such relief.
>
> THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT's HAVE CLEARLY ABUSED
> THERE DISCRETAION TO HINDER PRO-SE LITIGANTS THAT SPEND TO
> MUCH TIME IN THE LAW LIBRARY - FROM FILING LEGAL DOCUMENTS
> AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICIALS.
>
> AFTER A PRISONER FILES A LEGAL DOCUMENT IN FEDERAL COURT,
> THE COURT REVIEWS THE DOCUMENT AND DETERMINES IF IT HAS
> MERIT - IF IT CLEARLY APPEARS FROM THE FACE OF THE PETITION
> AND THE EXHIBITS THAT THE PETITION IS TRUE IN EVERY ASPECT
> THE COURT ---- WILL INTENTIONALLY DISMISS THE PETITION UPON
> GROUNDS IT FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM OR IS FRIVLOUS....THE
> COURT WILL THEN ISSUE A STRIKE TO THE PETITIONER'S
> FEDERAL COURT RECORD - IF THE PETITIONER SEEKS REVIEW FROM
> THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AND THE COURT DISMISSES
> THE PETITON - THE PETITONER RECEIVES ANOTHER STRIKE.
>
> UPON THE THIRD DISMISAL IN FEDERAL COURT A PRO-SE LITIGANT
> WHO IS TO POOR TO PAY THE FILING FEE'S IS PROHIBITED
> FROM FILING IN FEDERAL COURT.
>
> I GIVE YOU GREAT INSIGHT --- THERE IS NO PRISONER AND
> NEITHER CAN YOU, STATE A CLAIM IN FEDERAL COURT UNDER THE
> UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WITH-OUT YEARS OF READING
> CONSTITUTIONAL LAW --- THE COURT DESPITE THE FACT THE PRO-SE
> LITIGANT HAS A VALID CLAIM WILL INTENTIONALLY DISMISS AND
> ISSUE STRIKES TO PREVENT THE JAIL HOUSE LAWYER FROM FILING
> LEGAL DOCUMENTS.
>
> FOR SAKE OF AN EXAMPLE:
> SEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
> (DALLAS TEXAS)
> PETITON FILED 2000
> TITLED:
>
> CRAIG GILBERT AND MINOR DAUGHTER SKYLER B GILBERT
>
> VS
>
> THE UNITED STAES et al
>
> THE PETITION WAS SPECIFICALLY REQUESTING A RESTRAINING
> ORDER AGAINST THE STATE OF KANSAS, IN IT'S
> INTIRETY.........AND IF CONTINUE TO READ THIS BLOG
> YOU'LL SEE THE REASON A RESTRAINING ORDER WAS SOUGHT.
> PLEASE NOTE ALL THESE ACCURANCES LISTED WITH-IN THIS BLOG
> ACCURED AFTER THE 5th CIRCUIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS
> - DEEMED, DETERMINED AND DISMISSED MY PETITION AS FRIVOULUS
> ........ US DISTRICT COURT GT VANBEBBER IN AUGUST 2003
> KANSAS CITY, KANSAS - COMMENTED ON HOW IT WAS POSSIBLE THAT
> CRAIG IVAN GILBERT COULD FOR SEE ALL OF THIS IN 2000 AND
> SEEK A PROTECTION ORDER FROM THE STATE OF KANSAS.
>
> (YOU TELL ME KANSAS HOW COULD I FORSEE ALL OF THIS?
> BBECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN DOING IT TO ME ALL MY LIFE -
> ILLEGALLY INCARCERATING ME AT 17N I WENT INTO A QUICK SHOP
> ON 9th AND PACIFIC AT 2 IN THE MORNING FOR CHOCALATE MILK
> THE CASHIER HANDED ME BACK MY CHANGE W/ 3 BAGS OF DOPE!
> GUESS WHO IS SETTING OUTSIDE A COP......I GRABBED A LIGHTER
> OFF THE COUNTER AND BURNED THE DOPE IN THEIR OWN ASH TRAY
> AND LEFT THE CHANGE AS BILLS CAN BE MARKED TO APPEAR SELLS
> OF DRUGS ACCURED...I MIND YOU THIS IS WHEN I WAS 17! I NEVER
> EVEN DID DRUGS THOUGH SURE ENOUGH HERE THE COPS ARE TRING TO
> SET ME UP.....FOR A CRIME............THERE IS SO MUCH MORE
> DRAGGING ME IN ONE MORNING ON MY WAY TO WORK CLAIMING I TIED
> TO GET INTOP SOME WOMANS CAR - THE COP TOOK ME TO HARDEES
> ---- SOME WOMAN SAID THATS HIM..........THE COP TOOK ME TO
> JAIL...DID NOT CHARGE ME W/ ANYTHING TURNED ME LOOSE I WALK
> OUT OF THE POLICE STATION AND GET ARRESTED FOR DISORDELY
> CONDUCT CAUSE I TOLD SOME STUPID BITCH W/ A SMART MOUTH TO
> GO f@! HERSELF.)
>
> AS STATED THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISMISSED UPON
> GROUNDS IT WAS FRIVOULUS ------- 8 YEARS LATER IT TURNS OUT
> THE PETITION IS NOT FRIVOULUS, BUT WAS INFACT TRUE IN EVERY
> ASPECT! (1st STRIKE ISSUED)
>
> THEN THE APPEAL TO THE 5TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN La.
> (2ND STRIKE ISSUED)
>
> I WAS STRUCK OUT IN FEDERAL COURT BEFORE I EVER SAW A LAW
> LIBRARY.
>
> THOUGH THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS, I'VE NEVER FILED A
> FRIVOULUS PETITON --- AND AM PROHIBITED FROM FILING - IN
> FORMA PAUPERIS.
>
> AND CAN NOT AFFORD TO FILE A LEGAL DOCUMENT EVEN
> TODAY.....AGAIN I'M IMPRISONED DEPRIVED OF MY LIBERTY
> AND HAPPINESS BECAUSE NO ATTORNEY WILL TAKE THIS CASE ------
> THAT HAS SUCH AN EMOTIONAL IMPACT ON MY LIFE.
>
> THE DUE-PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STAES CONSTITUTION IS
> TO ACT AS SECURITY BLANKET AGAINST GOVERNMENT INTRUSIONS ON
> PERSONAL LIBERTIES, MEANING WE HAVE FEDERAL LAWS AND FEDERAL
> REGULATIONS AND A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT IS TO PROTECT US
> FROM THE EXACT ACT'S STATED W/IN THIS BLOG.......WE THE
> PEOPLE PAY TAXES FOR THIS PURPOSE......THE GOVERNMENT HAS
> NOT PROTECTED ME......AND THEY HAVE NOT PROTECTED ANY OF THE
> NUMEROUS ILLEGALLY INCACERATED INDIVIDUALS IN ELLSWORTH
> KANSAS - THAT WERE DEPRIVED OF RIGHT TO A FAIR AND UNBUIASED
> JUDICIAL TRIBUNE.
>
> WHEN ACTUALLY AWARE OF THE FACTS...THERE AWARE CAUSE I
> INFORMED THEM! AND STILL THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING! I AM AT
> THIS TIME MAKING A VARIFIABLE RECORD THAT THEY ARE AWARE AND
> DID NOTHING! MY E-MAILS ARE ALL VARIFIABLE.
>
> FOR ALL OF YOU READING THIS THAT IS HOW THE COURT'S DO
> THINGS -- THEY DRAG IT OUT FOR YEARS HOPING THE ILLEGllY
> INCACERATED INDIVIDUAL WILL GET BURNED OUT ON THE WHOLE MESS
> / OR AS IN MY CASE GET RELEASED FROM PRISON AND GO ON ABOUT
> ATTEMPTING TO REBUILD A LIFE THAT CAN-NOT BE
> REBUILD....BECAUSE THEY SO INTENTIONALLY DESTROYED
> IT...................
>
> IM GOING TO SUE THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IN THE COURT
> OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ----- THERE IS ONLY ONE DEFENDANT IN THAT
> COURT....
>
>
> THESE ARE THE ISSUES ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED IN ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY, KANSAS - IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC
> 1581(a)............PRETRIAL DETAINEE NOT ON PROBATION OR
> PAROLE HELD IN SOLITARY CONFINMENT FOR 17 MONTHS W/NO OUT OF
> CELL RECREATION , NO, T.V., NO RADIO, AND NO OTHER INMATE
> COMMUNICATION FOR PURPOSE OF COERCING A PLEA TO ILLEGAL
> CHARGES ROUGHT BY JOE SCHEPACK THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY.....ELLSWORTH KANSAS.......
>
> ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS HAVE IMPLEMENTED AND ENFORCED
> POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO COERCE ALLEDGED DEFENDANT S TO
> PLEAD GUILTY TO ILLEGAL CHARGES.
>
> MR. GILBERT WAS STUCK IN SOLITARY CONFINMENT DIRECTLY
> FOLLOWING FILING OF A LAW SUIT AGAINST THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> MEDICAL CENTER --- FOR ALLOWING 7-OFFICERS TO ENTER THEIR
> HOSPITAL AND PHYSICAL RESTRAIN CRAIG GILBERT BY FORCE AND
> TAKE HIS BLOOD!
>
> MR. GILBERT SOUGHT A COPY OF THE WARRANT THESE OFFICERS
> PRODUCED TO HOSPITAL PERSONELL.....AS THE WARRANT WAS NOT ON
> COURT FILE .........AND THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF
> TESTIFIED TO THESE FACTS DURING THE DUI TRIAL......HE
> TESTIFIED THAT THEY THE SHERIFF AND JOE SCHEPACK KEEP
> DOCUMENMTS IN A BOX IN THE BASMENT OF THE COURTHOUSE
> TESTIFIED TO IN OPEN COURT UNDER OATH.........FOR ALL YOU
> IDIOTS WARRANT AND PROBABLE CAUSE AFFIDAVITS ARE TO BE
> PUBLIC RECORD FILED W/ THE CLERK OF THE COURT......FOR
> INTENT AND PURPOSE WHEN I RECEIVED THE FATALLY DEFECTIVE
> WARRANT - IT WAS FILE STAMPED BY THE CLERK........NOW
> SOMEONE WISH TO EXPLAIN HOW A FILE STAMPED DOCUMENT WAS
> REMOVED FROM THE CLERKS OFFICE.........THE WHOLE FRIGGIN
> TOWN IS CORRUPT - AND YOU MADE THE CLERK OF THE COURTS
> HUSBAND, A JUDGE I THE SAME COUNTY.
>
> THE WARRANT WAS ISSUED CONTRARY TO KANSAS LAW AND WAS AN
> ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE ........ AS THIS WAS A NON INJURY
> ACCIDENT AND KANSAS LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR THE PHYSICAL
> RESTRAINT AND SEIZURE OF BLOOD BY WARRANT........
>
> THIS GOES TO THE CORE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS SPIRIT --
>
> JOE SCHEAPACK FURTHER FILED A DOCUMENT IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-113 TO PROHIBIT MR. GILBERTY FROM
> FILING LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN ANY OTHER COURT OTHER THAN
> ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT.
>
> 1ST AMEND. U.S. CONSTITUTION THE RIGHT TO PETITION THE
> GOVERNMENT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
>
> SO MUCH FOR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION...
>
> DID YOU HEAR ME - I SAID THAT JOE SCHEPACK A DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY IN THE STATE OF KANSAS FILED A SIGNED DOCUMENT IN A
> COURT OF LAW TO PROHIBIT CRAIG I. GILBERT FROM FILING IN ANY
> COURT OTHER THAN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT....IT
> APPEARS HE WAS WELL AWARE WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS ILLEGAL, AND
> WANTED TO CONSEAL HIS ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES.
>
> HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS ILLEGAL AND SO DOES THE FBI,
> THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, AND THE UNITED
> STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL.AND THE WHOLE STATE OF KANSAS -----
> THE QUESTION IS WHY IS HE STILL A DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN
> KANSAS AFTER KIDNAPPING SO MANY US CITIZENS ?
>
> ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF TRACY PLOUTZ FURTHER FILED A LEGAL
> DOCUMENT IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OR HIS AGENT
> SEEKING A SEARCH WARRANT FOR MR. GILBERTS CELL ...HE
> DETAILED HIS OPENING OF MR. GILBERTS MAIL ( ARNOLD KRATKY
> WILSON KANSAS FAMILY FRIEND COME TO MR. GILBERT AS HE WAS A
> TRUSTEE AND INFORMED MR. GILBERT THAT BILL SYLERS DEPUTY
> SHERIFF) HAD JUST ENTERED THE LIBRARY WITH A POT OF BOILNG
> WATER AND MR. GILBERTS LEGAL MAIL AND COVERED THE GLASS
> THOUGH LEFT A SMALL OPENING WERE MR. KRATKY WITNESSED BILL
> SYLERS STEAM OPEN MR. GILBERT'S LEGAL DOCUMENTS.
>
> FBI INFORMED 2004...............
>
> THESE INDIVIDUALS WERE UPSET CAUSE MR. GILBERT HAD SENT A
> LAWS SUIT TO 52 ELLSWORTH COUNTY RESIDENTS CLAIMING THEY HAD
> FAILED TO PROPERLY OVER SEE ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS
> ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES AND CLAIMING TO BE FALSLEY IMPRISONED!
>
> DURING MR. GILBERT'S PRELIMINARY HEARIMG MR. GILBERT
> PUT 13 WITNESS ON THE STAND WHICH HE MR. GILBERT
> SUPEONED.....MR. GILBERT PROVED EVERY PARAGRAPH OF A THREE
> PAGE POLICE REPORT WAS A LIE!
>
> THEN ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS CHANGED THE
> TRANSCRIPTS.........MADE IT LOOK LIKE MR. GILBERT DID NOT
> KNOW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT - WE ARE SPECIFICALLY
> SPEAKING ABOUT CASE 99-CR-113.
>
> I JUST GAVE YOU THE BREIF ISSUES REGARDING ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> THE REST IS FOUND W/IN THIS BLOG - THE FEDERAL COURT ORDER
> ORDERING JOE SCHEPACK THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DSTRICT ATTORNEY
> PROSECUTED DOES NOT COME TILL 2003..... UNITED STATES
> DISTRICT COURT KANSAS CITY, KANSAS -
>
> Craig T. Gilbert vs. state of Kansas et al. This case is
> remanded to state court...
>
> MY MIDDLE INITIAL IS NOT T. ----- BUT IT IS RECORDED IN
> THE CLERKS OFFICE ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE AS T.........THE
> COURT ORDER - ORDERS THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
> PROSECUTED - IF ANYONE HAS A COPY OF THE COURT ORDER OR/ANY
> OTHER COURT ORDERS --- PLEASE FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL THEM TO
> ME, OR POST THEM HERE AS A COMMENT.
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com..
>
> McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS DISTRICT COURT CASE
>
> 99-CR-174 - DISTRICT COOURT JUDGE CARL B. ANDERSON JR. AND
> A SHERIFF DEPUTY ISSUED A WARRANT FOR CRAIG I. GILBERT
> CHARGING MR. GILBERT WITH THEFT ---
>
> MR. ANDERSON WHOM ISSUED THE WARRANT BY KANSAS LAW WAS
> PROHIBITED FROM HOLDING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING BASED ON HIS
> PREVIOUS PROBALBLE CAUSE FINDING - WHEN HE ISSUED THE
> WARRANT.
>
> DURING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING TY KAUFFMAN MCPHERSON COUNTY
> DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAS ORDER3ED BY THE JUDGE TO AMEND THE
> COMPLAINT TO CHARGE THEFT BY DECEPTION......TY KAUFMAN
> DECLINED -= HE SAID THE COMPLAINT WAS JUST FINE .......
> MEANING HE HAD BEEN ORDERED TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE AND THE
> JUDGE HAD VIOLATED THE LAW AND HE WAS NOT GETTING ENVOLVED .
>
> STEVE HILGERS MY ATTORNEY APPOINTED BY THE COURT CAME TO ME
> AND OFFERED ME A PLEA AGREEMENT AFTER SPENDING NEARLY 2
> YEARS IN JAIL ALREADY AND SAID PLEA TO THE CHARGES IT WILL
> RUN CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT AND YOU
> WILL BE RELEASED - WHAT DID I HAVE TO LOSE I KNEW I HAD DONE
> NOTHING WRONG AND KNEW THIS MATTER WOULD CONTINUE UPON MY
> RELEASE...
>
> I PLEAD NO-CONTEST ON MY ATTORNIES PROMISE I WOULD BE
> RELEASED FROM CUSTUDY OR I WOULD NOT HAVE PLEAD GUILTY I
> WOULD HAVE WENT TO TRIAL AS I WAS NO-LONGER IN SOLITARY
> CONFINEMT.
>
> AT SENTENCING THE COURT SAID THIS CASE RUNS CONCURRENT W/
> ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-113 YOUR TIME
> STARTS TODAY........
>
> THREE DAYS LATER AS I WAS PREPAIRING MY OWN DOCUMNENTS TO
> W/DRAW MY PLEA MY ATTORNEY (what the fuck ever) CAME TO
> VISIT ME AT THE McPHERASON COUNTY JAIL - HE SAT ON THE OTHER
> SIDE OF A GLSS AND SPECIFICALLY STATED IM OVER HERE BECAUSE
> I KNOW YOUR MAD ----- HE TOLD MEE CRAIG I. GILBERT THAT HE
> WAS SORRY (YOU ARE A SORRY PIECE OF SHIT STEVE HILGERS) AND
> THAT HE WOULD WITHDRAW MY PLEA .
>
> FOR INTENT ANDD PURPOSE A MOTION TO W/DRAW A PLEA MUST BE
> FILED WITHIN 10 DAYS ......... HE ACTED REAL
> SINCERE.....................I NEVER HEARD FROM THE FUCKING
> MAGGOT AGAIN!
>
> THOUGH MR. HILLGERS WAS APPOINTED AS THE MCPHERSON COUNTY
> MAJISTRATE JUDGE DIRECTLY FOLLOWING THIS INCIDENT.
>
> THIS CONVICTION IN McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS VIOLATES 18 USC
> 1581(a) ......... I FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
> CORPUS STATING THIS FACT IT WENT THROUGH FEDERAL AND STATE
> COURTS.........
>
> THE KANSAS ATOTRNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE OFFICE FILED
> CONTINUANCES FOR TWO YEARS ON A SIMPLE THEFT CHARGE!
>
> A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS TO BE ANSWERED
> W/IN 45 - DAYS ........PHIL KLINE VIOLATED 18 USC 1581(b) HE
> AND OR HIS AGENTS OBSTRUCTWED ENFORCMENT OF FEDERAL LAWS
> WHEN ACTUALLY AWARE NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED BY CRAIG I.
> GILBERT ---
>
> RATHER THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED IN THE COURT HOUSE BY
> HIS COLLEAGUES.
>
> PHIL KLINES ACTIVITIES ARE LISTED W/IN THIS BLOG SITE --
> READ ON.
>
> SALINE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT SALINA, KANSAS
>
> SALINE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OFFICIALS FURTHER KIDNAPPED ME
> AND ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED ME IN THE LARNED STATE
> HOSPITAL.........IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW SPECIFICALLY
> ADMITTED W/OUT A WRITTEN ORDER BY A QUALIFIED MENTAL HEALTH
> PROFESSIONAL.......2005.
>
> I WAS ON BOND IN SALINE COUNTY KANSAS FOR ALLEDGED VEHICLE
> BURGLARY AND MISDEMENOR THEFT - I HAD ALLEDGEDLLY STOLE SOME
> CD'S (THOSE CD'S ARE BETTER DESCRIBED FURTHER IN
> THIS BLOG........ THOUGH FOR THE RECORD THE 1ST CD WAS BY
> KID ROCK TITLED:
>
> "FUCK YOU"
>
> TAKE IT HOWEVER YOU WANT - I'M SURE THE UNITED STATES
> DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS IN A MUCH BETTER POSITION, THAN
> MYSELF, TO GIVE YOU THE FACT'S SURRONDING THOSE
> CD'S........CAUSE THE FACT IS - NO CRIME WAS EVER
> COMMITED AND ELLEN MITCHELL THE SALINE COUNTY DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY AND/OR HER AGENT FILED A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WHEN
> INFACT NONE OF THE EVIDENCE POLICE REPORTS NOR
> TESTIMONY.....REFLECTED A CRIME IN THE FELONY COMPACITY.
>
> BUSINESS AS USUAL IN THE KANSAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM....BACK TO
> OTHER CRIMINAL ACTIVITY BY THE KANSAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM, I WAS
> ORDERED BY A SALINE COUNTY DISTRICT JUDGE TO UNDER-GO AN
> EVALUATION FOR COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL AS SAID - I WAS OUT
> OF JAIL ON BOND - I WENT TO MY SCHEDULED COMPETENCY
> EVALUATION AT THE SALINE COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY AND
> WAS DETERMINED COMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL....
>
> I SHOULD INFORM YOU AT THIS TIME --- THE CD SPEAKS FOR
> ITSELF ------ THIS WAS NOT MY TRIAL! IT WAS THE JUDICIAL
> SYSTEMS TRIAL........ ASKDOJ@USDOJ.GOV
>
> BACK TO COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL, THE SALINE COUNTY
> DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DAN BOYER -- DETERMINED ANOTHER
> EVALUATION WAS NECESSARY - HE ORDERED MR GILBERT TO THE
> LARNED STATE HOSPITAL FO RAN EVALUATION FOR COMPETENCY TO
> STAND TRIAL - AND ORDERED THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO SUBMITT
> THE PAPERS....... THE SALINE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY DID
> NOT SUBMITT THE PAPERS, MY OWN ATTORNEY DID PAUL HICKMAN A
> SALINE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER.......
>
>
> MR GILBERT THEN SPENT THE NEXT 9 MONTHS ILLEGALLY
> INCACERATED AND DETAINED IN A STATE HOSPITAL, THESE IDIOTS
> COULD NOT DETERRMINE IF MR GILBERT WAS COMPETENT TO STAND
> TRIAL...
>
> COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL IS THE ABILITY TO COMMUNICATE AND
> ASSIST IN YOUR DEFENSE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE CHARGES
> AGAINST YOU !
>
> I UNDERSTOOD THE CHARGES WELL, I UNDERSTOOD THE FEDERAL
> COURT ORDER ISSUED BY SAM CROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
> JUDGE ISSUED IN THE CASE, 2- MONTHS AFTER BEING ILLEGALLY
> ADMITTED TO THE LARNED STATE HOSPITAL!
>
> STSTING SOMEONE IN ELLSWORTH KANSAS WAS ON TRIAL! JOE
> SCHEPACK - I UNDERSTOOD VERY CLEARLY THAT THE UNITED STATES
> GOVERNMENT WAS ENVOLVED AND THAT THEY INTENTIONALLY ALLOWED
> ME TO REMAIN ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED WITH-OUT A WRITTEN
> ORDER BY A QUALIFIED MENTAL HEALTH PROFFESSIONAL AUTHORIZING
> MY ADMISSION TO THE LARNED STATE HOASPITAL ----- SEE - SAN
> BERNADINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT RECORDS SAN BERNADINO
> CALIFORNIA ---- CASE TITLED
>
> ........ STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. CRAIG GILBERT VS THE
> STATE OF KANSAS!
>
> SEE RECORDS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF KANSAS GOVENOR SEBELLIUS
> LIER JET DISPATCHED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ---- SEE
> RECORDS FOR LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WHOM ENTERED SAID
> FACILITY IN JUNE 2005....... MY PAROLE HEARING WAS HELD AND
> SOME GUY IN A SUIT WAS THERE ---- THE HEARING OFFICER GOT
> VERY SCARED WHEN I ASKED FOR A TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING
> BEING HELD... AND THE GUY IN THE SUIT - STARTED TRANSCRIBING
> (SHORT HAND) THE HEARING OFFICER LOOKED AT ME AND LOOKED AT
> HIM AND SAID WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE!
>
> THE HEARING OFFICER'S EYES GOT AS BIG AS SILVER DOLLARS
> AND HE ORDERED ME FROM THE ROOM.
>
> APPROXIMATLY FIVE DAYS LATER THE LANSING CORRECTIONAL
> FACILITY WENT ON FULL LOCK DOWN - OTHER THAN TO ALLOW THE
> INMATES OUT FOR BREAKFAST LUNCH AND DINNER - THE ONLY THING
> U SAW WAS SUITS....WHOM WAS THE SUITS?
>
> AND WHOM ALL ENTERED THAT FACILITY ON OR/ABOUT JUNE 25,
> 2005.......WAS ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS IN THAT FACILITY
> ON THAT DATE - I DO NOT KNOW ..... I DO KNOW THE HEAD OF THE
> GOON SQUAD SAID 5........WHAT EVER THAT MEANT! I TOOK IT 5
> PEOPLE WERE CONVICTED THAT DAY... AND IF SO WHY WAS I NOT
> RELEASED FROM PRISON INSTANTER WHAY WAS I HELD PAST MY
> PAROLE DATE WHY WAS I THEN TRANSFERED TO FORD COUNTY KANSAS
> - AND REQUIERED TO UNDERGO ANOTHER HEARING WERE OTHER
> INDIVIDUALS WERE THE ISSUE ODF DISCUSSION --- NOT CRAIG IVAN
> GILBERT..... MARK COWELL WAS MY ATTORNEY IN FORD COUNTY
> KANSAS IN FORD DISTRICT COURT CAASE 95-CR-517 WHOM ALLOWED
> ME TO BE IMPRISONED IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC
> 1581(a)............. SEE LARNED DISTRICT COURT RECORDS 2006
> HEARING HELD AFTER 2 DOCTORS DETERMINED CRAIG GILBERT WAS
> INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL......... SEE THE FINDING BY THE
> COURT ----- FINDING MARK COWELLS LAW PARTNER AND EX-WIFE THE
> INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL....THE WAR I
> WAS PUT INTO BY THE GOVERNMENT INSTEED OF STRAIGHT OUT
> PROSECUTING THESE CRIMINALS IN A COURT OF LAW.
>
> I'LL GET BACK TO THIS SUBJECT ------
>
> From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
>
> TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
>
> CHAPTER 21--CIVIL RIGHTS
>
> SUBCHAPTER I-A--INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS
>
> Sec. 1997. Definitions
>
> As used in this subchapter--
> (1) The term ....institution'' means any
> facility or institution--
> (A) which is owned, operated, or managed by, or
> provides
> services on behalf of any State or political
> subdivision of a State;
> and
> (B) which is--
> (i) for persons who are mentally ill, disabled,
> or retarded,
> or chronically ill or handicapped;
> (ii) a jail, prison, or other correctional
> facility;
> (iii) a pretrial detention facility;
> (iv) for juveniles--
> (I) held awaiting trial;
> (II) residing in such facility or
> institution for
> purposes of receiving care or treatment; or
> (III) residing for any State purpose in
> such facility or
> institution (other than a residential facility
> providing
> only elementary or secondary education that is
> not an
> institution in which reside juveniles who are
> adjudicated
> delinquent, in need of supervision, neglected,
> placed in
> State custody, mentally ill or disabled,
> mentally retarded,
> or chronically ill or handicapped); or
>
> (v) providing skilled nursing, intermediate or
> long-term
> care, or custodial or residential care.
>
> (2) Privately owned and operated facilities shall not
> be deemed
> ....institutions'' under this subchapter if--
> (A) the licensing of such facility by the State
> constitutes the
> sole nexus between such facility and such State;
> (B) the receipt by such facility, on behalf of
> persons residing
> in such facility, of payments under title XVI, XVIII
> [42 U.S.C. 1381
> et seq., 1395 et seq.], or under a State plan approved
> under title
> XIX [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.], of the Social Security
> Act,
> constitutes the sole nexus between such facility and
> such State; or
> (C) the licensing of such facility by the State,
> and the receipt
> by such facility, on behalf of persons residing in such
> facility, of
> payments under title XVI, XVIII [42 U.S.C. 1381 et
> seq., 1395 et
> seq.], or under a State plan approved under title XIX
> [42 U.S.C.
> 1396 et seq.], of the Social Security Act, constitutes
> the sole
> nexus between such facility and such State;
>
> (3) The term ....person'' means an individual,
> a trust or estate, a
> partnership, an association, or a corporation;
> (4) The term ....State'' means any of the
> several States, the District
> of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any of the
> territories
> and possessions of the United States;
> (5) The term ....legislative days'' means any
> calendar day on which
> either House of Congress is in session.
>
> (Pub. L. 96-247,
>
> SEE THIS SECTION:
>
> WHAT WOULD IT POSSIBLY TAKE TO GET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
> THE UNITED STATES TO FREE THOSE ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED
> UNITED STATES CITIZENS IN KANSAS.............THAT HAVE BEEN
> DEPRIVED OF A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL JUDICIAL TRIBUNE........
>
> TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
>
> CHAPTER 21--CIVIL RIGHTS
>
> SUBCHAPTER I-A--INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS
>
> Sec. 1997a. Initiation of civil actions
>
>
> (a) Discretionary authority of Attorney General;
> preconditions
>
> Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to
> believe that
> any State or political subdivision of a State, official,
> employee, or
> agent thereof, or other person acting on behalf of a State
> or political
> subdivision of a State is subjecting persons residing in or
> confined to
> an institution, as defined in section 1997 of this title,
> to egregious
> or flagrant conditions which deprive such persons of any
> rights,
> privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
> Constitution or
> laws of the United States causing such persons to suffer
> grievous harm,
> and that such deprivation is pursuant to a pattern or
> practice of
> resistance to the full enjoyment of such rights,
> privileges, or
> immunities, the Attorney General, for or in the name of the
> United
> States, may institute a civil action in any appropriate
> United States
> district court against such party for such equitable relief
> as may be
> appropriate to insure the minimum corrective measures
> necessary to
> insure the full enjoyment of such rights, privileges, or
> immunities,
> except that such equitable relief shall be available under
> this
> subchapter to persons residing in or confined to an
> institution as
> defined in section 1997(1)(B)(ii) of this title only
> insofar as such
> persons are subjected to conditions which deprive them of
> rights,
> privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
> Constitution of
> the United States.
>
> (b) Discretionary award of attorney fees
>
> In any action commenced under this section, the court
> may allow the
> prevailing party, other than the United States, a
> reasonable attorney's
> fee against the United States as part of the costs.
>
> (c) Attorney General to personally sign complaint
>
> The Attorney General shall personally sign any
> complaint filed
> pursuant to this section.
>
> (Pub. L. 96-247, Sec. 3, May 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 350; Pub.
> L. 104-134,
> title I, Sec. 101[(a)] [title VIII, Sec. 803(a)], Apr. 26,
> 1996, 110
> Stat. 1321, 1321-70; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104-140,
> Sec. 1(a), May
> 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.)
>
> WONDER HOW I KNOW ALL OF THESE LAWS -- THOUGH NO-ONE HAS
> PROVIDED MY MANDATORY RESTITUTION AS REQUEIRED BY FEDERAL
> LAW.........AND NO-ONE HAS CLEANED UP ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> KANSAS.....WHEN ACTUALLY AWARE OF THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES
> ..........
>
> I BELIEVE MR. US ATTORNEY GENERAL THIS IS CALLED
> INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DERESS BY A MEMBER OF
> THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT........
>
> CAUSE I AM VERY DERESSED AND AND I DO NOT SLEEP AT NIGHTS
> AS ARESULT OF THIS CORRUPTION CASE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN
> PROPERLY ADDRESSED......
>
> LOOK AT THE BRIGHT SIDE ------ YOULL BE FIXING THE ECONOMY
> WHEN YOU THROW- OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF CROOKED ATTORNEYS AND
> FREE ALL THOSE ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED PEOPLE IN ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY THAT WAS DEPRIVED OF RIGHT TO A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL
> JUDICIAL TRIBUNE............AS GAURANTEED BY THE UNITED
> STATES CONSTITUTION............SEE -------- YOU CAN
> PROSECUTE EVERY ONE OF THESE CROOKS UNDER THE GAURANTEE
> CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION..........IF YOU DO
> NOT PROSECUTE OR RIGHT, THIS GRAVE INJUSTICE........IS THE
> GAURANTEE OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION - REALLY A
> GAURANTEE OF OUR CIVIL RIGHTS OR NOT?
>
> Respectfully submitted UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!
>
> Sec. 1997d. Prohibition of retaliation
>
> No person reporting conditions which may constitute a
> violation
> under this subchapter shall be subjected to retaliation in
> any manner
> for so reporting.
>
> (Pub. L. 96-247, Sec. 6, May 23, 1980, 94 Stat. 352.)
>
> SOME-ONE NEEDS TO RIGHT THIS SITUATION BEFORE - I END UP IN
> JAIL -------CAUSE ALL OF THIS HAS HAD A DETRIMENTAL EFFECT
> ON ME........I NO LONGER SMILE AND HAVE NO DESIRE TO
> WORK............AND VODKA IS GETTING ME INTO TROUBLE!
>
> BUT WHO REALLY CARES........I KNOW NONE OF YOU DO..... DO
> ME A FAVOR PUT IT IN WRITING RIGHT HERE -------- WHAT THE
> TRUTH IS - WAS I OR WAS I NOT HELD IN 3 COUNTIES IN
> VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAWS? 18 USC 1581 (a)....WAS I OR WAS I
> NOT TORCHERD BY THE KANSAS JUDICIAL SYSTEM.....17 MONTHS
> SOLITARY CONFINMENT W/NO-ONE TO TALK TO - NO T.V. , RADIO,
> NOTHING JUST A CELL W/ A BUILT IN SHOWER AND MEALS SERVED
> THROUGH A SLOT IN THE DOOR.....WITH-OUT DUE PROCESS, NEVER
> PROVIDED A HEARING OR ANYTHING TELLING ME WHY I WAS PLACED
> IN SOLITARY CONFINMENT - A
>
> PRE-TRIAL DETAINEE.........HELD IN COUNTY JAILS W/NO
> SUNLIGHT FOR NEARLY 3- YEARS MALICOUSLY PROSECUTED .........
> eg SEE MEDICAL RECORDS 2002-2003 FOR SALINE COUNTY KANSAS
> JAIL...THE NURSE TOOK ONE LOOK AT ME STRESSED OUT WHITE AS
> A GHOST AND WENT TO THE SHERIFF.......AND REQUESTED I BE
> GIVEN SOME SUNLIGHT.....IT NEVER HAPPENED!
>
> HOW DO YOU THINK I FEEL........KNOWING KANSAS WAS ORDERED
> TO COMPENSATE ME .........AND NEVER DID ---- HOW LONG ARE
> YOU THE GOVERNMENT ..... GOING TO ALLOW ME NOT TO HEAL...HOW
> LONG?
>
> I WANT MY LIFE BACK ------ I NEED PURPOSE AND I DO NOT HAVE
> THE NECESSARY FUNDS TO REBUILD MY LIFE AT 40.
>
> 5:02 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Friday, November 07, 2008
>
>
> KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL WILL PROBABLY RESIGN
> Category: Web, HTML, Tech
>
> ANYONE WISH TO MAKE A CASH CONTRIBUTION TO THIS 8 YEAR
> INVESTIGATION ---- IT'S TIME CONSUMING AND I'M
> BROKE..............FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL ME..........ALL
> CONTRIBUTIONS WILL REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL.....any-publishers/
> movie producers want to buy the whole story?
>
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com
>
> JOE YOUR GOING TO BE A MOVIE STAR I GAURANTEE IT........AND
> A WHOLE LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE ALSO!
>
> KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL - RESIGNS - FOR
>
> DARALICTION OF DUTY,
>
> JOE SCHEPACK KANSAS DISTRICT ATTORNEY YOU SHOULD RESIGN
> TODAY - IF YOU HAVE NOT NOTICED THERE IS A STORM HEADING
> YOUR WAY...........AND ONE YOU HIGHLY DESERVE!
>
> KIDNAPPING IS A CRIME JOE SCHEPACK REMEBER JULY 2003...YOU
> KIDNAPPED ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> ANYONE HAVE ANY SUJESTIONS FOR JOE SCHEPACK, HERE IS HIS
> E-MAIL ADDRESS: coatty@gbta.net
>
> ALL THE IDIOTS ENVOLVED:
>
> TRACY PLOUTZ ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF!
>
> BARRY A. BENNINGTON JUDGE ELLSWORTH KANSAS
>
> MIKE KELLEY JUDGE ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS
>
> DALE URBANEK MAJISTRATE JUDGE ELLSWORTH KANSAS
>
> KENT ROTH ATTORNEY AT LAW ELLINWOOD KANSAS
>
> CARL B ANDERSON JR. DISTRICT JUDGE MCPHERSON KANSAS
>
> TY KAUFMAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY MCPHERSON KANSAS
>
> STEVE HILGERS MAJISTRATE JUDGE MCPHERSON KANSAS
>
> LEIGH HOOD DISTRICT JUDGE FORD COUNTY KANSAS
>
> DANIEL LOVE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FORD COUNTY KANSAS
>
> MARK COWELL ATTORNEY AT LAW GREAT BEND KANSAS
>
> SAM CROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
>
> DISTRICT JUDGE RENO COUNTY KANSAS
>
> PHIL KLINE -JOHNSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY (EX-KANSAS
> ATTORNEY GENERAL)
>
> CARLA J. STOVALL - EX KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, OBVIOUSLY
> DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO READ A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT!
>
> AND SEVERAL OTHERS I'LL GET BACK TOO:
>
>
> 725 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS BLOG.... ........ WONDER WHO
> THEY ARE --- AskDOJ@usdoj.gov Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
>
> STILL NO-ONE HAS OVER TURNED THESE ILLEGAL CONVICTIONS WHY
> ???????????????????????????????/
>
> ______________________________________________________
> From:
> "comments@whitehouse.gov"
> To:
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com
>
> .. On behalf of President Bush, thank you for your
> correspondence.
>
> We appreciate hearing your views and welcome your
> suggestions.
>
> Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House
> cannot respond to every message.
>
> Thank you again for taking the time to write.
> __________________________________________________________
> RE: CRIMINALS U HAVE NOT PROSECUTED!
> Friday, October 24, 2008 11:27 PM
> From:
> "ASKDOJ"
> To:
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com
> Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This
> is an automatic acknowledgement that your e-mail was
> received. It will be reviewed in the order it was received.
> __________________________________________________________________
>
> THESE ARE NOT THE CRIMINALS ......... THEY JUST LOOK THE
> OTHER WAY..........COWARDS!
>
> FOR SAKE OF AN EXAMPLE: I FOUND THIS SITE THAT SAID YOU
> COULD POST AND WRITE STORY'S AND THEY WOULD PAY FOR THE
> STORIES ---- I CUT AND PASTED THIS BLOG.....AS A
> JOURNALIST......... WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE RETURN E-MAIL FROM
> THE WRITERS FORUM........ SYING SHE DELETED THE BLOG ....
> AND SAYING SHE DID NOT UNDERSTAND ..... I JUST READ THE BLOG
> APPEARS IT'S IN PLAIN ENGLISH TO ME... AND CONTAINS
> PLAIN SENTENCES ....... SO WHERE HAS ARE SOCIETY GONE.....
> WHEN THE MEDIA WILL NOT PRINT THE TRUTH..........
>
> HERE IS THE RESPONSE:
> [Orato | True Stories, Citizen News, Eyewitness Reports,
> Free Notices] your post
> Tuesday, November 4, 2008 6:58 PM
> From:
> "heather@orato.com" heather@orato.com
>
> To:
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com
>
> CRIMINALJUSTICE,
>
> Heather Wallace
> (http://live.orato.com/user/heather-wallace) has sent you a
> message via your contact form
> (http://live.orato.com/user/7869/contact) at
> Orato | True Stories, Citizen News, Eyewitness Reports,
> Free Notices.
>
> If you don't want to receive such e-mails, you can
> change your settings at
> http://live.orato.com/user/criminaljustice.
>
> Message:
>
> Your posting was, well, I couldn't make sense of it.
> I've had to delete it. Please see about reformatting it
> so it is not in
> all-caps, uses complete sentences etc. Otherwise it's
> really not a story
> that we can promote.
> Thanks for your understanding.
> Heather Wallace
> senior editor
> Orato.com
> news@freedomforum.org,
> info@newseum.org,
> info@fac.org,
> mfetters@newseum.org, web@fac.org,
>
> tweishaar@lvcoks.com, jcyphers@holtonks.net,
> cleonhar@shawneecourt.org,
> kjohnson@mail.franklincoks.org, tmorgan@lyoncounty.org,
> bubba_saye@yahoo.com, mroberts@douglas-county.com,
> ndavenport@8thjd.com,
> Jennifer@kscourts.net, rise.haneberg@jocoks.com,
> ccsomac@11thjd.org,
> ccsobackstrom@dustdevil.com, bucso@southwind.net,
> jbrown@14thjudicialdistrict-ks.org,
> jim_robison@yahoo.com,
> hunter@fordcounty.net, cso17jdcs@ruraltel.net,
> mwilson@dc18.org,
> dansmith@hit.net, ctservechism@cpcis.net,
> kmurray@rileycountyks.gov,
> ccso22nd@jbntelco.com, 23rdcso@odsys.net,
> ccso24th@ruraltel.net,
> cso01@finneycounty.org, 26jdcso@swko.net,
> jhp@rcfc.reno.ks.gov,
> kevin.emerson@saline.org, dleapheart@wycokck.org,
> dhqueal@cyberlodg.com, ccsopjy@terraworld.net,
> mechlerc@kscourts.org, Susan.Gile@srs.ks.gov,
> Patty.Sandmeyer@srs.ks.gov, Mary.Cole@srs.ks.gov,
> Tina.Anthony@srs.ks.gov, Dave.Beukelman@srs.ks.gov,
> Jane.Meschberger@srs.ks.gov, Glenn.Leonardi@srs.ks.gov,
> Annette.Caraway@srs.ks.gov, Brian.Dempsey@srs.ks.gov,
> Tanya.Keys@srs.ks.gov, Daniel.Lewien@srs.ks.gov,
> Carolyn.Godinez@srs.ks.gov, Beth.Evans@srs.ks.gov,
> Kit.Pittier@srs.ks.gov, Beverly.Rogers@srs.ks.gov,
> Sherrie.Gross@srs.ks.gov, Susan.Green@srs.ks.gov,
> Mary.Hillin@srs.ks.gov, Patti.Dawson@srs.ks.gov,
> Janet.Kuntzsch@srs.ks.gov, Anita.Talley@srs.ks.gov,
> Jill.Loebel@srs.ks.gov, Tom.Munz @srs.ks.gov,
> Sue.Mckenna@srs.ks.gov, Jaymee.Metzenthin@srs.ks.gov,
> Debi.Nelson@srs.ks.gov, Patricia.Long@srs.ks.gov,
> Deanne.Dinkel@srs.ks.gov,
> Tom.Munz@srs.ks.govallen@senate.state.ks.us,
> apple@senate.state.ks.us, barnett@senate.state.ks.us,
> barone@senate.state.ks.us, betts@senate.state.ks.us,
> brownlee@senate.state.ks.us, bruce@senate.state.ks.us,
> brungardt@senate.state.ks.us, donovan@senate.state.ks.us,
> emler@senate.state.ks.us, francisco@senate.state.ks.us,
> gilstrap@senate.state.ks.us, goodwin@senate.state.ks.us,
> haley@senate.state.ks.us, hensley@senate.state.ks.us,
> huelskamp@senate.state.ks.us, jordan@senate.state.ks.us,
> journey@senate.state.ks.us, kelly@senate.state.ks.us,
> lee@senate.state.ks.us, lynn@senate.state.ks.us,
> mcginn@senate.state.ks.us, morris@senate.state.ks.us,
> ostmeyer@senate.state.ks.us, palmer@senate.state.ks.us,
> petersen@senate.state.ks.us, pine@senate.state.ks.us,
> pyle@senate.state.ks.us, reitz@senate.state.ks.us,
> schmidt@senate.state.ks.us,
> Vicki.Schmidt@senate.state.ks.us,
> schodorf@senate.state.ks.us, steineger@senate.state.ks.us,
> taddiken@senate.state.ks.us,
> teichman@senate.state.ks.us,
> umbarger@senate.state.ks.us, vratil@senate.state.ks.us,
> wagle@senate.state.ks.us, wilson@senate.state.ks.us,
> wysong@senate.state.ks.us, awagoner@mcphersoncounyks.us,
> bobbies@mcphersoncountyks.us, cindyt@kscourt.net,
> cschmidt@mcphersoncountyks.us, ewclerk@kans.com,
> letters@latimes.com, letters@nypost.com,
> mcema@sbcglobal.net, mcpcoatty@maccoatty.org,
> smeng@mcphersoncountyks.us, tploutz@leo.gov,
> kansas.city@ic.fbi.gov, president@whitehouse.gov,
> coatty@gbta.net, pat_roberts@roberts.senate.gov,
> sam_brownback@brownback.senate.gov, teichman@southwind.net,
> holmesM@house.state.ks.us, da@da.sbcounty.gov,
> info@nhic.org, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
> TheExperts@supportkids.com, lawinfo@cmht.com,
> saziz@cmht.com, lgreen@cmht.com, jreiser@cmht.com,
> jsellers@cmht.com, dtenny@cmht.com, abouhalkah@kcstar.com,
> babson@kcstar.com, bharbison@kcstar.com,
> linenberger@wichitaeagle.com, lmclendon@wichitaeagle.com,
> mcema@sbcglobal.net,
> mcpcoatty@maccoatty.org, mfannin@kcstar.com,
> mpepper@kcstar.com, mroehrman@wichitaeagle.com,
> newstips@kcstar.com, njungman@wichitaeagle.com,
> ocletters@latimes.com, psmith@wichitaeagle.com,
> rwaters@kcstar.com, saustin@kansascity.com, saziz@cmht.com,
> schisenhall@wichitaeagle.com, smeng@mcphersoncountyks.us,
> tdoty@kcstar.com, teichman@southwind.net,
> tfoxx@wichitaeagle.com, tshine@wichitaeagle.com,
> zieman@kcstar.com, hopeandpolitics@yahoo.com,
> bob.barth@cjonline.com, gary.warner@cjonline.com,
> gregg.ireland@cjonline.com, heather.johanning@cjonline.com,
> mark.nusbaum@cjonline.com, michael.napier@cjonline.com,
> pete.goering@cjonline.com, ron.beavers@cjonline.com,
> terri.benson@cjonline.com, community@indyrepnews.com,
> eciads@eaglecom.net, indy@eaglecom.net,
> circulation@cjonline.com, mark.nusbaum@cjonline.com,
> gregg.ireland@cjonline.com, heather.johanning@cjonline.com,
> ron.beavers@cjonline.com, gary.warner@cjonline.com,
> terri.benson@cjonline.com,
> pete.goering@cjonline.com, bob.barth@cjonline.com,
> michael.napier@cjonline.com, cgilbert@journalsentinel.com,
> smontague@salina.com, thostetter@salina.com,
> smontague@salina.com, thostetter@salina.com,
> gdemuth@salina.com, bwearing@salina.com, mstrand@salina.com,
> tunruh@salina.com, gfiedler@salina.com,
> tcampbell@salina.com, knorwood@salina.com,
> lsaenger@salina.com, bspessard@salina.com,
> tarnold@salina.com, rbronson@salina.com,
> datkinson@salina.com, mac2@salina.com, tbell@salina.com,
> jryba@salina.com, rbelden@salina.com, nquade@salina.com,
> tcorn@salina.com, amiddleton@salina.com, rnorlin@salina.com,
> newstips@hutchnews.com, webmaster@hutchnews.com,
> askhutch@hutchnews.com, photo@hutchnews.com,
> jmont@hutchnews.com, newsclerk@hutchnews.com,
> newsrelease@hutchnews.com, mmcqueen@hutchnews.com,
> feedback@kwch.com, news@kwch.com, stormshots@kwch.com,
> Chairman@gop.com, comments@koamtv.com, Counsel@gop.com,
> ecampaign@gop.com, MemberRelations@gop.com,
> Membershipservices@gop.com, Political@gop.com,
> RNCommunications@gop.com, tips@koamtv.com,
> ashley.macweb@gmail.com, emccaffrey@ksnt.com,
> katie.sentinel@gmail.com, macsentinelpub@sbcglobal.net,
> mcpproduction1@sbcglobal.net, mfarley@ksnt.com,
> nhill@ksnt.com, steve.macsports@gmail.com, thagen@ksnt.com,
> news@arkcity.net, dseaton@arkcity.net, daseaton@arkcity.net,
> susie@arkcity.net, news@arkcity.net, action@arkcity.net,
> mick@arkcity.net, reporter@arkcity.net,
> photographer@arkcity.net, records@arkcity.net,
> sports@arkcity.net, action@arkcity.net, micah@arkcity.net,
> chris@arkcity.net, heidi@arkcity.net, laurar@arkcity.net,
> classman@arkcity.net, webmaster@arkcity.net,
> circman@arkcity.net, circdesk@arkcity.net,
> composing@arkcity.net, abby.barnett@kake.com,
> abby.lippold@kake.com, anita@ksn.com, apowell@ksn.com,
> asimborio@ksn.com, avickers@ksn.com, ben.bradley@kake.com,
> cbrown@ksn.com, chris.frank@kake.com, dave.grant@kake.com,
> davefreeman@ksn.com,
> deb.farris@kake.com, dhertneky@ksn.com,
> gallery@abilenerc.com, Jared.Cerullo@kake.com,
> jason@ksn.com, JDRudd@ksn.com, jeff.herndon@kake.com,
> jemelle.holopirek@kake.com, jgalgaier@ljworld.com,
> jhaskell@ksn.com, jkraemer@ksn.com, kmashek@ksn.com,
> larry.hatteberg@kake.com, lifestyles@abilenerc.com,
> natasha.trelfa@kake.com, news@abilene-rc.com,
> news@arkcity.net, sbergmann@ksn.com, sports@abilenerc.com,
> susan.peters@kake.com, circulation@gbtribune.com,
> classified@gbtribune.com, dhogg@gbtribune.com,
> email@gbtribune.com, locallife@gbtribune.com,
> obits@gbtribune.com, sports@gbtribune.com, art@hpj.com,
> hmartin@hpj.com, jlatzke@hpj.com, journal@hpj.com,
> korebaugh@hpj.com, ldreiling@aol.com, llampe@hpj.com,
> newproducts@hpj.com, richhpj@aol.com, ttaylor@hpj.com,
> vcrick@hpj.com, cchristian@kcstar.com,
> circserv@wichitaeagle.com, cpiwowarek@kcstar.com,
> dbormann@kcstar.com, dvoorhis@wichitaeagle.com,
> eadams@kcstar.com, gclark@kcstar.com,
> gelliott@wichitaeagle.com,
> jbhargava@kcstar.com, jhays@wichitaeagle.com,
> kmanweiler@wichitaeagle.com, ldiuguid@kcstar.com,l
> inenberger@wichitaeagle.com, lmclendon@wichitaeagle.com,
> mfannin@kcstar.com, mpepper@kcstar.com,
> mroehrman@wichitaeagle.com, newstips@kcstar.com,
> njungman@wichitaeagle.com, psmith@wichitaeagle.com,
> rwaters@kcstar.com, saustin@kansascity.com,
> schisenhall@wichitaeagle.com, tdoty@kcstar.com,
> tfoxx@wichitaeagle.com, tshine@wichitaeagle.com,
> zieman@kcstar.com beke@ku.edu, bhala@ku.edu, bsix@ku.edu,
> casad@ku.edu, cbriscoe@ku.edu, dprater@ku.edu,
> drahozal@ku.edu, escat@ku.edu, eschroed@ku.edu,
> esward@ku.edu, eweeks@ku.edu, flovitch@ku.edu,
> gagrawal@ku.edu, gottlieb@ku.edu, hoeflich@ku.edu,
> jhead@ku.edu, jjeffers@ku.edu, jpearson@ku.edu,
> jpeck@ku.edu, jrosenberg@ku.edu, jsheldon@ku.edu,
> kmeyer@ku.edu, lbond@ku.edu, lhines@ku.edu, mbd@ku.edu,
> mdwilson@ku.edu, micdavis@ku.edu, mkautsch@ku.edu,
> mpaget@ku.edu, patti@ku.edu, ped@ku.edu, phillips@ku.edu,
> pkeller@ku.edu, r-glicksman@ku.edu, rlevy@ku.edu,
> sclark@ku.edu, scm@ku.edu, SF@lists.oznet.ksu.edu,
> sleeds@ku.edu, smazza@ku.edu, stevemac@ku.edu,
> suzmac@ku.edu, tgstacy@ku.edu, torrance@ku.edu, ware@ku.edu,
> whecker@ku.edu, lawblog@wsj.com, teresavz@sbcglobal.net,
> sheila@janeleecomm.com, DueserL@bartonccc.edu,
> conneckt@eaglecom.net, gazettegl@yahoo.com, snovak@kshs.org,
> bfunke@activeagingonline.com,
> lizkennedy@wscribe.com, sheila@janeleecomm.com,
> jlatzke@hpj.com, starkel@swbell.net, rjayalla@wichita.edu,
> rjayalla@wichita.edu, teresavz@sbcglobal.net,
> sheila@janeleecomm.com, DueserL@bartonccc.edu,
> conneckt@eaglecom.net, gazettegl@yahoo.com, snovak@kshs.org,
> bfunke@activeagingonline.com, trombeck@ljworld.com,
> bhershberger@pmma.org,
>
> * claythorne@columbus-ks.com
> * cwilson@hbwkwlaw.com
> * cybersea3@aol.com
> * hallfame@emporia.edu
> * jeanne2510@yahoo.com
> * kkruse@hbwkwlaw.com
> * leach@fnb.com
> * mbeamward@hbwkwlaw.com
> * refunds@forleasebyowner.com
> * thill@hbwkwlaw.com
> * wilsoncy@wtciweb.com
>
> * bettyb@ncfhaaa.com
> * ecfi@kdoc.dc.state.ks.us
> * ew@lists.oznet.ksu.edu
> * ew_county_appraiser@wan.kdor.state.ks.us
> * ewclerk@kans.com
> * ewweed_08@sbcglobal.net
> * jimm@independenceinc.org
> * jsneath@ellsworth.net
> * kanhistique@classicnet.net
> * kansas@barackobama.com
> * kkerby@kans.com
> * libirobbins@yahoo.com
> * mikee@lv-cpa.com
> * nationaldrovers@yahoo.com
> * nnicholas@shhlawyers.com
> * pbooher@ellsworthks.net
> * rob_fillion@yahoo.com
> * sales@locateadoc.com
> * scritch@awav.net
> * smccay@mail.franklincoks.org
> * yellowpages@gatehousemedia.com
>
> * bsl117@sbcglobal.net,
> * david@aliglaw.com,
> * jimh@woodard-law.com,
> * larry@lrmearslaw.com,
> * mmcfarland@wsabe.com,
> * pfisher@rrv.net,
> * tashort@tshortlaw.com,
> * ticketvoid1@gmail.com,
> * afbc@carrollswebb.com
> * aogwelks@sutv.com
> * deberry@spst.edu
> * faithag777@sbcglobal.net
> * faithchapelag@webtv.net
> * firstagmulvane@prodigy.net
> * frfred@netscape.com
> * john.martin@agmd.org
> * jtreolo@ks-ne.org
> * office@unitedbelieverschurch.org
> * opagmops@gmail.com
> * pastor@ihoppe.com
> * paulthurston41@hotmail.com
> * peter.guzulaitis@saintwenceslaus.org
> * southbroadwaybaptist@yahoo.com
> * tlcjefia@netins.net
> * vfwc@aol.com
> * cano@civilrights.org
> * citizen@cccr.org
> * comactwin@tmo.blackberry.net
> * comactwin@yahoo.com
> * crp@ucla.edu
> * eddie@lacivilrights.org
> * elaine@hcr.org
> * ernest@lacivilrights.org
> * kao@civilrights.org
> * leah@hcr.org
> * 74651.333@compuserve.com
> * 76042.3271@compuserve.com
> * abffe@bookweb.org
> * ajc-dc@clark.net
> * amerunited@aol.com
> * amish@holycrosslivonia.org
> * anneburt@tmn.com
> * ard@radparker.com
> * bjc_intern@bjcpa.com
> * bwong@corp.idt.net
> * casp@sirius.com
> * cfac@cfac.org
> * ciec@cdt.org
> * cjfe@cjfe.org
> * dbarker@mailbag.com
> * djw@cdt.org
> * doyle@tiac.net
> * eff@eff.org
> * flandon@infi.net
> * foodspeak@cspinet.org
> * frbspd@crl.com
> * freedom@well.com
> * ftrf@ala.org
> * gfaf@mindspring.com
> * gilc@gilc.org
> * hrwnyc@hrw.org
> * ifas@berkshire.net
> * indexoncenso@gn.apc.org
> * Ioif@ala.org
> * jwheeler@igc.apc.org
> * kyp@ultranet.com
> * lff@lff.org
> * mail@tialliance.org
> * Mediacoalition@mediacoalition.org
> * molleen@natcenscied.org
> * nas@nas.org
> * ncac@ncac.org
> * ncarl@aol.com
> * ncfe@ncfe.net
> * nctecsuh@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu
> * news@freedomforum.org
> * nfoic@reporters.net
> * nw-fact@aa.net
> * oif@ala.org
> * pen@pen.org
> * pfaw@pfaw.org
> * pipking@mail.firn.edu
> * quillnet@link2000.net
> * rcfp@rcfp.org
> * rmo@Virginia.edu
> * roc@theroc.org
> * tmi@clark.net
>
> KANSAS GOVENOR KATHLEEN SEBELLIUS HER CONFIRMATION E-MAIL:
>
> Thank you for your e-mail
>
> Thank you for your e-mail message to my office. Your views
> are very important to me and I appreciate your taking the
> time to share your comments and concerns.
>
> Governor Kathleen Sebelius governor@ks.gov
>
> For your information here is what you sent:
> Title: Mr.
> First Name: CRAIG IVAN
> Last Name: GILBERT
> Address: ANYWHERE BUT KANSAS
> Address2:
> City: TOPEKA
> State: KS
>
> ALL OF THESE PEOPLE HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THIS BLOG AND
> NUMEROUS OTHERS...............I HAVE YET TO RECEIVE ONE
> SINGLE REPLY, SILENCE THEY BELIEVE WILL PROTECT THEM!
>
> THEY CAN ALWAYS CLAIM I NEVER SAW THAT YEAH RIGHT WAIT TILL
> THE FBI COMES IN AND CONFISCATES THEIR COMPUTERS TO PROVE
> THE TRUTH!
>
> AND ALL IS WELL...........WONDER HOW THE KANSAS ATTORNEY
> GENERAL PLANS TO ESCAPE ----
>
> Consumer Protection Form
> Monday, October 13, 2008 5:19 PM
> From:
> "Kansas Attorney General"
>
> To:
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com
> Thank
> you for submitting your online complaint. Please remember
> to mail or
> fax (785-291-3699) copies of ALL documents relevant to this
> complaint to the Kansas Attorney General's Consumer
> Protection Office, 120 S.W. 10th Avenue, 4th Floor, Topeka,
> KS 66612 with a letter stating your name, address and phone
> number and indicating that you have previously submitted
> your
> complaint online. Relevant documents may include
> advertising material,
> contracts, warranty information, receipts, letters, checks
> (front and
> back), photographs, bills and invoices, etc. FAILURE TO
> PROVIDE ALL
> RELEVANT DOCUMENTS MAY CAUSE UNNECESSARY DELAY IN THE
> HANDLING OF YOUR
> COMPLAINT.
>
>
>
> HE CAN NOT RUN --- NOR HIDE!
>
>
> I HAVE A VARIFIABLE E-MAIL FROM HIS OFFICE..CAN-NOT EVEN
> BELIEVE HE'S NOT RESOLVED THIS MATTER... ALREADY
> IT'S BEEN A WHOLE WEEK.....SINCE HE RECEIVED THE
> COMPLAINT ----- HOW IS IT POSSIBLE A PUBLIC OFFICAL OF HIS
> STATUR - A KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL ---- CAN WASTE TAX PAYER
> MONEY BY DRAGING OUT A SIMPLE OPEN AND SHUT CASE.
>
> SEE IF I WAS THE KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL - I WOULD SIMPLY
> PICK UP THE PHONE AND CALL THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY, THE MCPHERSON COUNTY ATTORNEY, AND THE FORD COUNTY
> DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND GIVE THEM EACH 72 HOURS TO RIGHT THE
> WHOLE FINGGGG MESS OR LEAVE OFFICE......
> THIS IS WHAT ARE SOCIETY HAS COME TO - THEY PUBLIC
> OFFICIALS PLAY LIKE THERE INVESTIGATING WHEN IN-FACT
> EX-KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE DONE INVEASTIGATED THE
> WHOLE CASE AND CONSEALED IT.... THAT IS, HE CONSPIRED W/
> JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS TO DEPRIVE A UNITED STATES CITIZEN OF
> HIS CIVIL RIGHTS....
>
>
>
> JUST DAYS BEFORE I SUE YOU JOE SCHEPACK< TY KAUFMAN<
> LEIGH HOOD..in the criminal capacity with a whole lot of
> others!
>
> JUST KIDDING I'M NOT GOING TO SUE U GUYS - THAT ALREADY
> PROVED USELESS!
>
> I'M JUST GOING TO SEND THIS BLOG TO EVER NEWS MEDIA AND
> PUBLIC OFFICIAL IN THE UNITED STATES!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I GUESS IN 2 TO 5 YEARS EVERYONE THAT RECEIVED A COPY CAN
> ANSWER TO THE CONSPIRACY CHARGES!
>
> ANOTHER E-MAIL CONFIRMATION KANSAS SENATOR PAT
> ROBERT'S:
>
>
> Correspondence from Senator Roberts
> Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1:52 PM
> From:
> "Correspondence_Reply@roberts.senate.gov"
> To:
> newyorkcgilbert@yahoo.com
>
> Thank you for contacting my office via e-mail. This
> response is to let you know that your e-mail arrived.
> Despite the large volume of e-mail my office receives daily,
> every effort is made to respond to your concerns in a timely
> fashion. If your message is urgent, please call my
> Washington, DC office at 202-224-4774. You may also call one
> of my offices in Kansas: Overland Park, 913-451-9343;
> Topeka, 785-295-2745; Wichita, 316-263-0416; Dodge City,
> 620-227-2244. Again, thank you for taking the time to
> contact me. If you would like more information on issues
> before the Senate, please visit my website at
> http://roberts.senate.gov. You may also sign up on my home
> page for a monthly electronic newsletter that will provide
> additional updates on my work for Kansas.
>
> SIGN UP FOR UPDATES ON HIS WORK FROM KANSAS?.........BY THE
> LOOKS OF THIS BLOG ----- HE
>
> Currently listening :
> American Idiot
> By Green Day
> Release date: 2004-09-21
>
> 4:10 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Monday, October 13, 2008
>
>
> you
>
> THIS IS THE BIG ISSUE ------ I'VE BEEN ILLEGALLY
> INCARCERATED IN KANSAS 4-TIMES.........SEE::::::OFFICIAL
> KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WEB SITE EACH AND EVERY
> CONVICTION IS ILLEGAL.........AND FEDERAL AND STATE
> AGENCIES ARE WELL AWARE AND HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO CONCEAL THIS
> JUDICIAL CONSPIRACY FROM THE PUBLIC - WHICH HAS A
> DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON MR. GILBERTS ECONOMCIAL PURSUIT -
> MANDATORY RESTITUTION AS REQUIERED BY LAW. AS MR GILBERTS
> CONVICTIONS REMAIN ON HIS CRIMINAL RECORD AND UNTILL A COURT
> OF LAW MAKES A WRITTEN JUDICIAL FINDING AS REQUIERED BY LAW
> --- WHICH HAS NEVER ACCURED IN OVER 20 FILINGS- IN STATE OR
> FEDERAL COURTS.......AND AS A DIRECT RESULT MR. GILBERT IS
> PROHIBITED FROM RECEIVING COMPENSATION FOR OVER 5 + YEARS
> ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED...
>
> COURT RECORDS CLEARLY SHOW THE CONSPIRACY BY THE JUDICIAL
> SYSTEM......AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHOM ARE PAID BY THE US
> CITIZENS TO RESOLVE THESE MATTERS........
>
> 18th Innocent Man Freed in 1 Texas County; Officials Vow
> Change
> Posted Apr 30, 2008, 06:15 pm CDT
> By Martha Neil
>
> For the 18th time in approximately seven years, an innocent
> man cleared by DNA testing reportedly has been released from
> prison by one Texas county.
>
> This time it was 55-year-old James Woodard who walked out
> of a Dallas courtroom yesterday, a free man. He had served
> 27 years in prison for the murder of his girlfriend—the
> longest time ever spent in prison by anyone subsequently
> exonerated by DNA testing, Reuters reported. Like many other
> wrongfully convicted individuals, he is a black man, the
> news agency writes, and his case "highlight[s] problems
> in the local justice system that include what critics have
> said is a history of racism and racial profiling."
>
> Woodard could have been released earlier, if he admitted
> his "guilt" in the rape-murder to the state parole
> board. But he refused to do so, reports the Associated
> Press.
>
> "It says a lot about your character that you were more
> interested in the truth than your freedom," state
> District Judge Mark Stoltz told Woodard as he ordered his
> release. To formally be declared innocent, Woodard must now
> obtain an appellate court order or a pardon from the Texas
> governor, according to AP.
>
> The deluge of wrongful convictions in Dallas
> County—reportedly there have been 18 inmates since 2001
> who were cleared by DNA testing, the most in any one county
> in the country—has caught the attention of state
> lawmakers, according to Reuters and the Innocence Project.
> (Counts on the number of innocent prisoners freed in Dallas
> County have varied in different media reports; however, 18
> now appears to be the current, correct number although some
> news reports say it is 17.)
>
> In a press release, the project says Rodney Ellis, a Texas
> state senator, has promised reform and organized a landmark
> Summit on Wrongful Convictions at the state capitol in
> Austin on May 8 to address the issue.
>
> "We've reached a tipping point on wrongful
> convictions in Texas. Nobody can seriously doubt that
> there's a problem, and next week leaders from across our
> criminal justice system will come together to start solving
> it," Ellis tells the Innocence Project. "We will
> bring a wide range of leaders, experts and exonerees
> together for a full day to develop concrete, common-sense
> remedies to make our system of justice more fair and
> accurate. We won't solve these serious problems in one
> day, but we will make historic strides toward restoring
> confidence in our criminal justice system."
>
> Meanwhile, the Dallas County district attorney says he
> intends to lobby for change, including the statewide
> establishment of "conviction integrity units,"
> reports the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram.
>
> Investigators were initially steered in the wrong direction
> by the victim's stepfather. He told police that Woodard
> came to their home the night she was murdered and asked for
> the 21-year-old woman, but the stepfather says he now
> believes he was mistaken, reports the Dallas Morning News.
>
> The error was compounded, the newspaper says, when
> prosecutors illegally withheld from the defense at trial
> exonerating evidence about three other men who were with the
> victim the night she was murdered. Two of the three were
> later convicted of sexual assault.
>
> Related coverage:
>
> ABAJournal.com: "Texas Man Innocent in Rape Case; 16th
> Wrongful Conviction in Dallas County"
>
> ABAJournal.com: "Free at Last After 25 Years, Former
> Inmate Marvels at Life"
>
> ABAJournal.com: "Columnist Asks, How Can I Trust the
> Justice System
>
>
>
> CALIFORNIA_________________________________________
>
> Wrongly convicted of rape, man files claim against city of
> Lodi
>
> By Jake Armstrong, News-Sentinel Staff Writer
>
> A former Lodi man whose conviction was tossed out of court
> after he served 10 years in prison for a crime DNA later
> showed he did not commit, has filed a claim against the city
> of Lodi.
>
> Peter Rose was convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl in
> 1994 after the alleged victim named him as the man who
> grabbed her from behind and dragged her into an alley behind
> the 400 block of Eden Street. In 2004, the girl later
> admitted she had no idea who raped her, and DNA evidence
> later cleared Rose of the crime.
>
> He was released from Mule Creek State Prison in Ione after
> a San Joaquin County judge tossed his conviction in October
> 2004.
>
> Rose's three children have also filed claims against
> the city.
>
> In his claim, usually a precursor to a lawsuit, Rose
> alleges that members of the police department used interview
> techniques that "were so coercive and abusive" to
> the alleged victim that the interviewers should have known
> "the techniques would and did yield false
> information," including the identification of Rose as
> the perpetrator.
>
> Rose, now 37, also alleges members of the police department
> "deliberately concealed evidence" they should have
> known would clear Rose's name and "pressured and
> coerced" others involved in the investigation to
> "alter and suppress exonerative evidence,"
> according to the claim.
>
> Transcripts from a portion of a police interview with the
> alleged victim, now 24, indicate the girl adamantly denied
> knowing who had attacked her. The News-Sentinel is not
> naming her since she was sexually assaulted.
>
> "I'm telling you I don't know who it
> was," the girl told police detectives Matt Foster and
> Ernie Nies, according to the transcript.
>
> Both Foster and Nies are named in Rose's claim.
>
> It also states Rose was unable to have normal interactions
> with his children, family and friends and missed out on
> family events and business opportunities as result of the
> wrongful conviction and subsequent jail time.
>
> Rose seeks from the city damages in excess of $25,000. The
> date of loss is listed as Feb. 18, the date the order of
> exoneration was entered.
>
> The city, however, did not receive the claim until April
> 28.
>
> Claims filed by Rose's children each seek damages in
> excess of $25,000 because the children were denied the right
> to associate with their father as result of the wrongful
> conviction.
>
> All four claims are scheduled to go before the Lodi City
> Council at its meeting Wednesday. City staff has recommended
> the council deny the claims, which is a routine action.
>
> Neither City Attorney Steve Schwabauer nor Rose's
> attorney, Mark E. Merin, could be reached for comment late
> Friday.
>
> Contact reporter Jake Armstrong at jakea@lodinews.com.
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> Michael Evans, Paul Terry, Dana Holland and LaFonso Rollins
> 4 men get pardons, clean slates
> After serving 10 to 27 years, all cleared by DNA tests
> _______________________________
> Rollins and Holland, who spent about a decade in prison,
> will each qualify for about $145,000 under the formula.
>
> Even though Evans and Terry each spent about 27 years
> behind bars, they will only get about $160,000 because that
> is the maximum allowed, said Jeff Urdangen, attorney for
> Terry.
>
> GOOD EXAMPLE ------ OF BULLSHIT LAW Makers WHOM SET A CAP
> ON THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED FOR AN ILLEGAL INCARCERATION......
>
> AND A PISS POOR ATTORNEY TO BOOT!
>
> WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PROSECUTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS THAT
> ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED THEM?
>
> I WOULD BET IF WE START PROSECUTING THESE DEFENSE ATTORNIES
> AND PROSECUTORS FOR MALICOUS ACTS ---- WE WOULD NOT HAVE SO
> MANY ILLEGAL INCARCERATIONS .... AND I TELL U PUBLIC -----
> 27 YEARS TO BE EXONERATED - THAT IS YOUR LEGAL SYSTEM!
>
> YOU ARE UNABLE TO FILE IN THE COURTS AND GET A PROPER
> HEARING.ON DOCUMENTS..THESE PEOPLE CAN NOT AFFORD ATTORNIES
> AND IF THEY CAN --- THE ATTORNEY JUST SOAKS UP THE MONEY AND
> DRAGS IT OUT AS LONG AS THE COURTS LIKE...
>
> EXAMPLE: IN 2003 I FILED A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS
> CORPUS.....(BASICALLY A PETITION CLAIMING UNLAWFULL
> CONICTION AND IMRISONMENT)
>
> US Government Guide:
> writ of habeas corpus
>
> Article 1, Section 9, of the U.S. Constitution states:
> "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not
> be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion
> the public Safety may require it." The Latin term
> habeas corpus means "You shall have the body." A
> writ is a written order from a court of law that requires
> the performance of a specific act. A writ of habeas corpus
> requires officials to bring a person whom they have arrested
> and held in custody before a judge in a court of law, where
> they must convince the judge that there are lawful reasons
> for holding the prisoner. If the judge finds their reasons
> unlawful, then the court frees the suspect. The writ of
> habeas corpus is a strong protection for individuals from
> government officials who might want to jail them merely
> because they belong to unpopular groups or express
> criticisms of the government.
>
> § 2254. State custody; remedies in Federal court.
>
>
> (a) The Supreme Court, a Justice thereof, a circuit judge,
> or a district court shall entertain an application for a
> writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody
> pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground
> that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or
> laws or treaties of the United States.
>
> I, CRAIG IVAN GILBERT CLEARLY CLAIMED IN UNITED STATES
> DISTRICT COURT TOPEKA, KANSAS (McPHERSON COUNTY ,
> KANSAS-CASE) THAT I WAS HELD IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC
> 1581..CLAIMED IT RIGHT THRU KANSAS COURT SYSTEM...CHARGED W/
> SIMPLE FELONY THEFT
>
> EX-KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE"s OFFICE
> SUSPENDED THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,IN
> VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9 OF THE US CONSTITUTION..
>
> WHAT ELSE DO U CALL TWO YEARS OF MOTION FOR CONTINUANCES
> ON A SIMPLE THEFT CHARGE WHY COULD A BIG POWERFUL KANSAS
> ATTORNEY GENERAL NOT ANSWER A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS
> CORPUS ALLEDGING THE CONVICTION VIOLATED 18 USC
> 1581.......... I TELL U WHY! THE MAGGOT ALLOWED ME TO REMAIN
> ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED ------ ALLOWED ME TO BE ILLEGALLY
> IMPRISONED IN CALIFORNIA AND ALLOWED ME TO BE RETURNED TO A
> CONDITION OF PEONAGE IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a) - SOME
> FEDERAL OFFICIAL NOW WISH TO LOCK THIS MAN UP?
>
> (b)
> (1) An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of
> a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State
> court shall not be granted unless it appears that—
> (A) the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in
> the courts of the State; or
> (B) (i) there is an absence of available State corrective
> process; or
> (ii) circumstances exist that render such process
> ineffective to protect the rights of the applicant.
>
> I BELIEVE THIS BLOG CONSTITUTES A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
> HABEAS CORPUS................WHO'S FILING THE PETITION
> ----MAYBE JOE SCHEPACK SHOULD!
>
> 10:35 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Monday, November 10, 2008
>
>
> I’m truly not trashing GEORGE W. BUSH!
>
> I JUST DO NOT UNDERSTAND ------- WHY HE DOES NOT BLUNTLY
> TELL ME ------ WHY I SPENT 5 + YEARS ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED
> AND I HAVE NOT BEEN COMPENSATED WHEN IN FACT -------HE IS
> WELL AWARE --------------OF THIS ISSUE SINCE 2005!
>
> HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO ISSUE AN EXECUTIVE ORDER!
>
> I WILL TELL YOU -------- IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN IN MY FAVOR -
>
> MANDATORY RESTITUTION AS REQUIERED BY LAW, DENIED - IS THAT
> NOT RIGHT MR. PRESIDENT.....FOR SAKE OF AN EXAMPLE I GET
> THESE E-MAILS ALL THE TIME -------- IF THE GOVERNEMNT WISH
> TO SETTLE W/ME THEY WOULD THEY GET A KICK OUT OF SENDING ME
> THESE E-MAILS........... TELLING ME TO SEND THEM
> MONEY........WHEN THEY KNOW I'M BROKE. DO NOT EVER
> BELIEVE THE FBI WOULD ALLOW SOMEONE TO USE THE HEAD OF THE
> FBI OFFICES NAME IN AN E-MAIL AND NOT DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
> THIS IS A COPY OF THE E-MAIL I FORWARDED IT TO THE FBI IN
> WASHINGTON THEY HAVE ME BLOCKED AS A SPAM SENDER IT NEVER
> GOT DELIVERED - OR IS IT THE BLOKED IT SO IT DOES NOT END UP
> IN THERE FILES , IN ANY CASE I'M THROUGH PLAYING GAMES =
> I'M BUILDING MY NEXT CASE --- CALLED A BIG FAT LAW
> SUIT........ FOR DARALICTION OF DUTY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS!
> URGENT ATTENTION NEEDED
> Monday, November 10, 2008 3:04 PM
> From:
> "Federal Bureau of Investigation"
> Add sender to Contacts
> To: undisclosed/ reciepants
>
> Anti-Terrorist And Monitory Crime Division.
> Federal Bureau Of Investigation.
> J.Edgar.Hoover Building Washington Dc
>
> Attn: Beneficiary,
>
> This is to Officially inform you that it has come to our
> notice and we have thoroughly Investigated with the help of
> our Intelligence Monitoring Network System that you are
> having an illegal Transaction with Impostors claiming to be
> Prof. Charles C. Soludo of the Central Bank Of Nigeria, Mr.
> Patrick Aziza, Mr Frank Nweke, Dr. Philip Mogan, none
> officials of Oceanic Bank, Zenith Banks, kelvin Young of
> HSBC, Ben of FedEx, Ibrahim Sule,Larry Christopher, Dr.
> Usman Shamsuddeen, Puppy Scammers are impostors claiming to
> be the Federal Bureau Of Investigation. During our
> Investigation, we noticed that the reason why you have not
> received your payment is because you have not fulfilled your
> Financial Obligation given to you in respect of your
> Contract/Inheritance Payment.
>
> Therefore, we have contacted the Federal Ministry Of
> Finance on your behalf and they have brought a solution to
> your problem by cordinating your payment in total
> USD$11,000.000.00 in an ATM CARD which you can use to
> withdraw money from any ATM MACHINE CENTER anywhere in the
> world with a maximum of $4000 to $5000 United States Dollars
> daily. You now have the lawful right to claim your fund in
> an ATM CARD.
>
> Since the Federal Bureau of Investigation is involved in
> this transaction, you have to be rest assured for this is
> 100% risk free it is our duty to protect the American
> Citizens. All I want you to do is to contact the ATM CARD
> CENTER via email for their requirements to proceed and
> procure your Approval Slip on your behalf which will cost
> you $250.00 only and note that your Approval Slip which
> contains details of the agent who will process your
> transaction.
>
> CONTACT INFORMATION
> NAME: MR. DANIEL SMITH
> EMAIL: danielsmithng@yahoo.cn
>
> Do contact Mr. Daniel Smith of the ATM CARD CENTRE with
> your details:
>
> FULL NAME:
> HOME ADDRESS:
> TELL:
> CELL:
> CURRENT OCCUPATION:
> BANK NAME:
>
> So your files would be updated after which he will send the
> payment information's which you'll use in making
> payment of $250.00 via Western Union Money Transfer or Money
> Gram Transfer for the procurement of your Approval Slip
> after which the delivery of your ATM CARD will be effected
> to your designated home address without any further delay.
> We order you get back to this office after you have
> contacted the ATM SWIFT CARD CENTER and we do await your
> response so we can move on with our Investigation and make
> sure your ATM SWIFT CARD gets to you.
>
> Thanks and hope to read from you soon.
>
> ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
> DIRECTOR
> FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
> UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
> WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535
>
> Note: Do disregard any email you get from any impostors or
> offices claiming to be in possession of your ATM CARD, you
> are hereby advice only to be in contact with Mr. Daniel
> Smith of the ATM CARD CENTRE who is the rightful person to
> deal with in regards to your ATM CARD PAYMENT and forward
> any emails you get from impostors to this office so we could
> act upon and commence investigation.
>
>
> ALL IT WILL COST ME IS $250.00 TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY
> DOLLARS - I'D BET REAL MONEY THIS E-MAIL IS REALLY FROM
> THE FBI AND YOU COULD NOT PROVE IT IN A MILLION YEARS.
>
>
>
> I STOOD FOR U GEORGE W. BUSH AND TODAY I CONTINUALLY ASK MY
> SELF WHY?
>
> KANSAS CITY PD (MO)
>
> VS
>
> CRAIG I. GILBERT
>
> VS
>
> THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL (ET AL)
>
> THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
> NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (FILED 2008)
>
> A PETITION PROTECTING GEORGE W. BUSH ............. I WAS IN
> WASHINGTON D.C. AND BOARDED A GREYHOUND BUS TO TEXAS - WHERE
> AT THE TIME THE 17th ILLEGAL INMATE IN THE TEXAS
> CORRECTIONAL FACILITY WAS BEING RELEASED FROM CUSTODY AFTER
> DOING MOST OF HIS LIFE ILLEGALLY IMPRISONED.
>
> I BOARDED GREYHOUND EXPECTING A FOUR DAY JOURNEY, WAS I
> EVER WRONG I WAS THERE THE NEXT DAY.MY GREYHOUND BUS
> MYSTERIIOUSLY TURNED IN TO A DIRECT SHUTTEL, TO DALLAS
> TEXAS, WERE I WAS CONVIENTLY ARRESTEDON AN OUT OF STATE
> WARRANT...... OUT OF KANSAS CITY (MO) ....... I WAS HELD ON
> A NO BAIL HOLD AND WITH-OUT AN ATTORNEY FOR TWO MONTHS
> ------ THE MAJISTRATE JUDGE SIGNED A OFFICIAL COURT DOCUMENT
> STATING ALL MY RIGHTS UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
> ... RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY RIGHT TO BAIL.....AND SEVERAL OTHER
> RIGHTS - WHEN I ADDRESSED THE COURT REGARDING MY EIGHT
> AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BAIL..... I WAS ORDERED OUT OF THE COURT
> ROOM....AND ESC ORTED TO A SINGLE CELL BY AN OFFICER, THE
> OFFICER IS THE ONE THAT LATER BROUGHT ME MY OFFICIAL COURT
> DOCUMENT SIGNED BY THE JUDGE STATING MY CONSTITUTIONAL
> RIGHTS............NEEDLESS TO SAY THE RIGHTS SHE JUST
> BLANTLY VIOLATED BEFORE THE INK EVEN DRIED!
>
> A COPY OF SAID DOCUMENT IS FILED IN THE UNITED STATES
> DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS,
> TEXAS....... IN KANSAS CITYPD (MO) VS CRAIG GILBERT VS.
> UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
>
> ANOTHER COURT ORDER I WILL HAVE TO EXPLAIN TO YOU... IT
> GAVE THE JUDGE THIRTY DAYS TO EXPLAIN IF SHE WAS TRYING TO
> MOVE HER CRIMINAL PROSECUTION TO THE FEDERAL COURT HOUSE ON
> THE 30 TH DAY I WAS MYSTERIOUSLY RELEASED FROM
> JAIL.........STILL HAVE A PENDING WARRANT ON
> NCIC...............I GUESS KANSAS CITY (MO) WANTS ME TO COME
> PROSECUTE ALL THESE IDIOTS HERE-IN!
>
> DID I MENTION THE FBI OFFICE I CONTACTED IN 2004 IS LOCATED
> IN KANSAS CITY (MO) CONNECT THE DOT'S WHOM IS
> RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING ME ARRESTED AND DETAINED, AND WHY IS
> THE FBI SAYING THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS CORRUPT AND INFORMING
> THE PUBLIC WOULD BE WRONG ---- WHY WOULD IT BE
> WRONG.............AND WHERE WAS GEORGE W. BUSH DURING ALL OF
> THIS ------ SETTING RIGHT THERE IN THE WHITEHOUSE KEEPING A
> VERY CLOSE EYE ON THESE CRIMINAL COURTS!
>
>
>
> FOR SIGNING MY ILLEGAL EXTRADITION PAPERS IN 2000 WHILE HE
> WAS GOVENOR OF TEXAS ------- CLEARLY SHOWING ATTORNIES DO
> NOT STAND FOR THE LAW...THEY STAND FOR THEIR PAY-CHECKS -
> PAID FOR BY THE TAX PAYERS.............
>
> ________________________________________________________
>
> THIS IS WHO I AM!
>
> Maria Gabriela Ochoa, 22, Ramona Ochoa, 20, Socorro Adriana
> Ochoa, 18, and their niece 11 year old Norma Ochoa in
> Upland, California. (Eyewitness in preliminary hearing for
> accused hut and run driver - "The Chevy Suburban was
> rear-ended, then flipped and landed on its roof in flames.
> Three men smashed out a window and escaped; the driver and
> three women were trapped inside and screaming for someone to
> save them. (Craig) Gilbert stopped his truck on the shoulder
> of 10 Freeway, grabbed a blanket off the road to shield
> himself from the flames and ran to the wreckage. He tried to
> pull one woman out through the window, but her leg was
> pinned. A little girl in the back couldn't get free of
> her seat belt, so Gilbert tried to help her instead.
> Ultimately, he saved no one. "It just went into flames,
> it engulfed her," Gilbert said Tuesday. "There was
> gas everywhere.." - courtesy Daily Bulletin)
>
> I'D LIKE TO SEE WHICH ONE OF YOU WOULD RUN INTO FLAMING
> INFERNO TO SAVE SOME-ONE ............ YOU WOULD'NT -
> YOUR A BUNCH OF COWARDS.
>
> AND FOR THE RECORD I WAS BURNED EXSTENSIVLY...... THE
> RANCHO CUCAMUNGA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (CALIFORNIA)
> OFFERED ME MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELINg, YOU EVER WATCH AN 11
> YEAR OLD GIRL BURN ALIVE IN YOUR ARMS..AND HER MOTHER ALL
> WHOM WERE TALKIN TO YOU.
>
> THAT WAS REALLY A NICE JESTURE,
>
> WHY HAS NO ONE OFFERED ME IN HELP IN THIS CASE.......I WENT
> THRU A HELL OF A LOT MORE IN THIS CASE THAN WATCHING THAT
> CHILD BURN ALIVE........... I SET IN THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY
> JAIL IN SOLITARY CONFINMENT AND LITTERALLY STARTED PULLING
> OUT MY HAIR............DID ANYONE CARE - NO NOT EVEN THE
> UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WHEN THE ALLOWED ME TO BE ARRESTED
> AND HELD IN JAIL CELLS CAUSE THEY WANTED ME TO PROSE CUTE
> THESE PUBLIC OFFICIALS W/OUT A PUBLIC TRIAL.....AND STILL
> TO THIS DAY I SUFFER GREAT EMOTIONAL DISTRESS FROM THERE
> ACT'S AND WHAT DOES A MAN DO - JUST THIS WEEKEND I WAS
> ASSAULTED AND THROWN IN HANDCUFFS BY THREE INDIVIDUALS THE
> COP SHOWS UP AND I GET A TICKET FOR TRESSPASSING.
>
> ALL I WANTED WAS THE SURVELLIANCE VIDEO, DO U THINK I GOT
> IT, HELL NO, MY NAMES CRAIG GILBERT AND NO-ONE LIKES MY
> ATTITUDE - SO MUCH FOR THE US CONSTITUTION, FREEDOM OF
> EXPRESSION - IS NO LONGER FREE.
>
> I SURE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW MY HAS ALERT'S ON THIS SIGHT
> ALL I HAVE TO DO IS POST SOMETHING AND 20 PEOPLE
> AUTOMATICALLY SHOW UP AS VIEWERS ......... SCHEPACK YOU
> BETTER LEAVE OFFICE -- AND YOU HAD BETTER ADMIT WHAT YOU DID
> TO ME - BECAUSE I HAVE TO SUE THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
> OVER A MAGGOT SUCH AS YOU........I WILL BANKRUPT
> KANSAS......
>
>
>
>
>
> 4:44 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Friday, October 03, 2008
>
>
> IMPRISONMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT IS ILLEGAL!
> Category: Web, HTML, Tech
>
> Bailey v. Alabama, 211 U.S. 452 (1908), was a United States
> Supreme Court case which overturned the peonage laws of
> Alabama. The Alonzo Bailey case is regarded as being the
> most important case of its kind after the Dred Scott v.
> Sandford decision, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).
>
> Alonzo Bailey was a African American from Alabama who
> agreed to work for one year at $12 per month. He received an
> advance of $15. After working for a little over a month he
> stopped work, but did not refund any money. According to
> Alabama law such refusal to work and refund the money was
> prima facie evidence of intent to defraud.
>
> The Supreme Court found that holding a person criminally
> liable for taking money for work not performed was akin to
> indentured servitude, outlawed by the Thirteenth Amendment,
> insofar as it required that person to work rather than be
> found guilty of a crime. The case is important because the
> peonage laws of the State of Alabama were found to be
> unconstitutional.
>
> NOTE I HAD INSURANCE FROM HARTFORD FOR BREACH OF
> CONTRACT......ARISING DURING ROUTINE BUSINESS.
>
> I CONTACTED THEN KANSAS INSURANCE COMMISIONER KATHLIEN
> SEBELLIUS ( NOW KANSAS GOVENOR) AT THE TIME I WAS BEING
> MALICOUSLY PROSECUTED IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY,
> KANSAS..........SHE BLEW ME OFF - SEE HER WRITTEN AND SIGNED
> LETTER LOCATED IN THE KANSAS INSURANCE COMMISIONERS OFFICE!
>
>
>
> 3:53 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Wednesday, October 08, 2008
>
>
> WHERE IS MY MANDATORY RESTITUTION?
>
>
>
> I WAS IMPRISONED FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT IN 3 KANSAS
> COUNTIES :::::
>
> FORD COUNTY KANSAS 95-CR-501
>
> MCPHERSON COUNTY, KANSAS 99-CR174
>
> ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS 99-CR113
>
> SPENT 5 YEARS ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED AND THEN SENT TO THE
> STATE OF CALIFORNIA ILLEGALLY AND IMPRISONED AN ADDITIONAL 3
> MONTHS ........... THEN ARRESTED AND HELD ILLEGALLY ON A
> KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WARRANT CLAIMING I WAS A
> FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE......WHEN IN FACT I WAS KIDNAPPED BY
> CALIFORNIA AND TRANSPORTED OVWER INTERSTATE HIGWAYS.
>
> (FEDERAL JURISDICTION)
>
> RELEASED FROM CUSTODY AFTER FILING IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (THE FEDERAL COURT DID NOT
> ISSUE ME A CASE ) THOUGH A COPY OF MY COMPLAINT CAN BE FOUND
> IN THE SAN BERNADINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
> ............STAMPED BY THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES
> DISTRICT COURT!
>
> CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SEVERAL MONTHS LATER - I MEET A
> HOMELESS PERSON - WHOM ONE DAY SAID " WE KNOW ALL ABOUT
> THOSE FEDERAL DOCUMENTS IN KANSAS!" AND THEN I'M
> PUT ON THE GOVENORS LIER JET AND FLOWN BACK TO
> KANSAS.....W/OUT ANYONE SAYING ONE DAMN WORD TO ME!
>
> AND I MIGHT ADD IT WAS AN ILLEGAL EXTRADITION VIOLATING 18
> USC 1581(a) WHOMEVER RETURNS SOMEONE TO A CONDITION OF
> PEONAGE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO KNOW MORE THAN 20 YEARS IN
> PRISON!
>
> I SENT GOVENOR SEBELLIUS A LETTER IN 2004 WHILE BEING
> ILLEGALLY DETAINED IN CALIFORNIA ON SAID PAROLE HOLD
> VIOLATION.THRU HER HUSBAND GARY SEBELLIUS UNITED STATES
> MAJISTRATE JUDGE ..............I FIGURED THEY COULD DISCUSS
> IT OVER COFFEE.......THEY DISCUSSED IT ALL RIGHT............
>
> I'VE BEEN PAYING FOR IT EVERY SINCE,
>
>
> ..TR> ..TR>
>
> WHERE IS MY MANDATORY RESTITUTION AS REQUIERD BY
> LAW----GOVENOR SEBELLIUS!
>
> A BREACH OF CONTRACT ARISING DURING THE COURSE OF ROUTINE
> BUSINESS ......IS NOT A CRIME IT'S A CIVIL
> MATTER...............
>
> IN THIS CASE A CIVIL MATTER NOW TURNED CRIMINAL --- AND
> THE STATE OF KANSAS REPRESENTITIVES ARE THE CRIMINALS!
>
> From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
> [wais.access.gpo.gov]
> [CITE: 18 USC 1593]
>
>
> TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
>
> PART I--CRIMES
>
> CHAPTER 77--PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING IN
> PERSONS
>
> Sec. 1593. Mandatory restitution
>
> (a) Notwithstanding section 3663 or 3663A, and in
> addition to any
> other civil or criminal penalties authorized by law, the
> court shall
> order restitution for any offense under this chapter.
> (b)(1) The order of restitution under this section
> shall direct the
> defendant to pay the victim (through the appropriate court
> mechanism)
> the full amount of the victim's losses, as determined
> by the court under
> paragraph (3) of this subsection.
> (2) An order of restitution under this section shall be
> issued and
> enforced in accordance with section 3664 in the same manner
> as an order
> under section 3663A.
> (3) As used in this subsection, the term ....full
> amount of the
> victim's losses'' has the same meaning as
> provided in section 2259(b)(3)
> and shall in addition include the greater of the gross
> income or value
> to the defendant of the victim's services or labor or
> the value of the
> victim's labor as guaranteed under the minimum wage and
> overtime
> guarantees of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201
> et seq.).
> (c) As used in this section, the term
> ....victim'' means the
> individual harmed as a result of a crime under this
> chapter, including,
> in the case of a victim who is under 18 years of age,
> incompetent,
> incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the
> victim or a
> representative of the victim's estate, or another
> family member, or any
> other person appointed as suitable by the court, but in no
> event shall
> the defendant be named such representative or guardian.
>
> (Added Pub. L. 106-386, div. A, Sec. 112(a)(2), Oct. 28,
> 2000, 114 Stat.
> 1488.)
>
> THE CRIME::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> ..TR> ..TR>
>
> Bailey v. Alabama,..27.. the Court voided another Alabama
> statue which
> made the refusal without just cause to perform the labor
> called for in a
> written contract of employment, or to refund the money or
> pay for the
> property advanced thereunder, prima facie evidence of an
> intent to
> defraud and punishable as a criminal offense, and which was
> enforced
> subject to a local rule of evidence which prevented the
> accused, for the
> purpose of rebutting the statutory presumption, from
> testifying as to
> his ....uncommunicated motives, purpose, or
> intention.'' Inasmuch as a
> state ....may not compel one man to labor for another in
> payment of a debt
> by punishing him as a criminal if he does not perform the
> service or pay
> the debt,'' the Court refused to permit it ....to
> accomplish the same
> result [indirectly] by creating a statutory presumption
> which, upon
> proof of no other fact, exposes him to
> conviction.''..28..
>
>
>
>
>
> From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
> [wais.access.gpo.gov]
>
> [CITE: 42USC1994]
>
>
> TITLE 42--THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
>
> CHAPTER 21--CIVIL RIGHTS
>
> SUBCHAPTER I--GENERALLY
>
> Sec. 1994. Peonage abolished
>
> The holding of any person to service or labor under the
> system known
> as peonage is abolished and forever prohibited in any
> Territory or State
> of the United States; and all acts, laws, resolutions,
> orders,
> regulations, or usages of any Territory or State, which
> have heretofore
> established, maintained, or enforced, or by virtue of which
> any attempt
> shall hereafter be made to establish, maintain, or enforce,
> directly or
> indirectly, the voluntary or involuntary service or labor
> of any persons
> as peons, in liquidation of any debt or obligation, or
> otherwise, are
> declared null and void.
>
> (R.S. Sec. 1990.)
>
> Codification
>
> R.S. Sec. 1990 derived from act Mar. 2, 1867, ch. 187,
> Sec. 1, 14
> Stat. 546.
> Section was formerly classified to section 56 of Title
> 8, Aliens and
> Nationality.
>
> THE CRIMINAL CRIME:
>
> From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
> [wais.access.gpo.gov]
>
> [CITE: 18USC1581]
>
>
> TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
>
> PART I--CRIMES
>
> CHAPTER 77--PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING IN
> PERSONS
>
> Sec. 1581. Peonage; obstructing enforcement
>
> (a) Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition
> of peonage,
> or arrests any person with the intent of placing him in or
> returning him
> to a condition of peonage, shall be fined under this title
> or imprisoned
> not more than 20 years, or both. If death results from the
> violation of
> this section, or if the violation includes kidnapping or an
> attempt to
> kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or the attempt to commit
> aggravated
> sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, the defendant shall be
> fined under
> this title or imprisoned for any term of years or life, or
> both.
> (b) Whoever obstructs, or attempts to obstruct, or in
> any way
> interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this
> section, shall be
> liable to the penalties prescribed in subsection (a).
>
> DOES THIS APPLY TO JUDGES AND ATTORNIES.....NO ITY DOES
> NOT THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT APPLY TO THE
> CRIMINALS _ SUCH AS KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL PHIL
> KLINE.......HIS OFFICE CLEARLY PREVENTED THE ENFORCMENT OF
> THIS SECTION, AND SO DID THE JUDGES....READ ON TO GET A
> BETTER UNDERSTANDING.
>
> (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 772; Pub. L. 103-322,
> title XXXIII,
> Sec. 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L.
> 104-208, div.
> C, title II, Sec. 218(a), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat.
> 3009-573; Pub. L.
> 106-386, div. A, Sec. 112(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat.
> 1486.)
>
> BREACH OF CONTRACT IS A CIVIL MATTER!
> LOOK AT THE NATIONAL DEBT.......YOU PEOPLE DO NOT APPEAR TO
> BE ANY BETTER BUSINESS PERSON THAN I AM.
>
> MAYBE WE SHOULD PROSECUTE ALL OF YOU FOR THEFT BY
> DECEPTION.
>
> ..TABLE>
>
> 3:15 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
> Thirteenth Amendment--Slavery and Involuntary Servitude
>
> Thursday, October 02, 2008
>
>
> UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
> Category: Web, HTML, Tech
>
> OCTOBER 2, 2008
>
>
>
> UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
>
> ON JANUARY 16, 2008 I FILED A DOCUMENT ENTITLED EX PARTY
> CRAIG I. GILBERT
>
> EXPEDITED PETITON TO MODIFY CHILD SUPPORT
>
> WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
> SERVICE I HAVE A RECEIPT FROM MR. LEAVITTS LEGAL COUNSEL.
>
> NEVER RECIEVED A EXPEDITED HEARING NOR A RESPONSE IN
> WRITTING DID I MR. LEAVITT.......
>
> FOR ALL YOU WHOM READ THIS, I'M CLEARLY SHOWING YOU THE
> UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND LAW'S OF THIS COUNTRY ARE
> NULL AND VOID....UNENFORCABLE IN ANY COURT OF THE UNITED
> STATES.......
>
> I CLEARLY IN PLAIN ENGLISH IMFORMED SAID UNITED STATES
> DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - OF THE LAWS AND
> BASIS FOR MY COMPLAINT!
>
> 1...FALSLEY IMPRISONED IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a)
>
> 2. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES ILEGALLY SEIZED BY THE STATE OF
> KANSAS.
>
> 3 DEPRIVED OF HEARING ON THIRD PARTY COUNTER CLAIM IN
> SALINE COUTY KANSAS - DISTRICT COURT PETITION CAPTIONED
>
> STATE OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION
> SERVICES ON BEHALF OF MONA EVELIGH AND MINOR CHILD SKYLER
> B. GILBERT.
>
> VS.
>
> CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
>
> VS
>
> THE STATE OF KANSAS ET AL.
>
>
>
> LET ME EXPLAIN I WAS ARRESTED IN SALINE COUTY KANSAS AND
> HELD ON A CASH $5,000.00 DOLLAR BOND FOR NON-SUPPORT OF A
> CHILD.
>
> I SIMPLY FILED A THIRD PARTY COUNTER CLAIM AS I HAD BEEN
> ILLEGASLLY INCARCERATED IN 4 SEPERATE COUNTIES - STATED ALL
> THE VERIFIABLE FACT'S AND WHEN I WENT TO COURT - LESS
> THAN 3 MINUTES OF OPENING MY MOUTH.THE JUDGE SAID TO SHERIFF
> PERSONEL GET THIS MAN OUT OF MY COURT ROOM!
>
> FOR FULL INTENT AND PURPOSE I NEVER HAD ANOTHER COURT
> HEARING AND NEVER RECIEVED A HEARING ON MY PETITION!
>
> THAT IS, I WAS RELEASED FROM CUSTODY ON A $5000,00 DOLLAR
> CASH BOND - AND NEVER GIVEN ANOTHER COURT HEARING!
>
> THOUGH THE STATE OF KANSAS TO THIS DAY GARNISHES MY PAY
> CHECKS AND STEALS MY FEDERAL INCOME TAXES.........HOW AND
> WHY - THEY THE STATE OF KANSAS FILED A COMPLAINT - I FILED A
> COMPLAINT AND WAS NEVER GIVEN A HEARING ON MY PETITION
> ------- THIS IS YOUR LEGAL SYSTEM WHOM CLAIMS TO CARE ABOUT
> YOUR CHILDREN.........
>
> THIS IS THE UNITED STAED DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
> SERVICES WHOM CLAIMS TO CARE ABOUT YOUR
> CHILDREN..........IT'S SO EVIDENT WHEN ONE MAN CAN NOT
> GET A WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED
> STATES ON A CLEARLY LEGIBLE LEGAL DOCUMENT AND THE COURTS
> WILL NOT GIVE THIS ONE MAN A HEARING ON CONSTITUTIONAL
> CLAIMS ------- WHEN A MINOR CHILD IS ENVOLVED, DO THEY REALY
> CARE ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN,,,,,,,I'M TRULY NOT ASKING I
> ALREADY KNOW THE TRUTH ---- THEY WISH TO COVER THIS
> UP.............IT'S CALLED A CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE A
> UNITED STATES CITIZEN SPECIFICALLY CRAIG I. GILBERT, OF HIS
> RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.
>
> THERES MORE TO MY PETITION -- EXPLAINED TO MR. LEAVITT -
> THE WAIVER OF THE UNITED STATES TO BE SUED IN CHILD SUPPORT
> MATTERS...I CLEARLY IN PLAIN ENGLISH ENFORMED MR. LEAVITT OF
> ALL APPLICABLE LAW'S.
>
> IT'S VERAFIABLE SEE THE DOCUMENT HAND DELIVERED TO HIS
> LEGAL COUNSEL IN WASHINGTON D.C. ON JANUARY 16, 2008.
>
> THIS BLOG IS NOT SOME JOKE ------ I'VE INVESTED A LOT
> OF YEARS ON THIS AND DO NOT INTEND TO ALLOW IT TO GO AWAY
> WITH-OUT A BIG FAT CHECK...AND JOE SCHEPACKs RESIGNATION AND
> BAR LICENSE!
>
> I HAVE ALREADY STARTED CONTACTING SCREEN -WRITERS....THIS
> IS MOVIE MATERIAL...... AND TO ALL US GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
> IF I OWE ANYONE AN APOLIGY WHEN THIS IS OVER -- I'M MAN
> ENOUGH TO APPOLIGIZE.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 8:50 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Wednesday, October 01, 2008
>
>
> VERIFIABLE FEDERAL COURT ORDER
>
> PDF]
> Gilbert also submitted an affidavit of poverty which the
> court
> File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
> Having reviewed Gilbert's limited financial resources,
> ... CRAIG I. GILBERT, Defendant. ... petition for a writ of
> habeas corpus after first exhausting ...
> bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/pacer/kansas/ksdce/5:2006cv03120/56455/4/0.pdf
> - Similar pages
>
> Verifiable federal court order
>
> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
>
> FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
>
> STATE OF KANSAS, et al.,
>
> Plaintiffs,
>
> CIVIL ACTION
>
> vs. No. 06-3120-SAC
>
> CRAIG I. GILBERT, Defendant.
>
> ORDER
>
> Before the court is a notice of removal filed by a
> defendant in
>
> a pending criminal action in the Ellsworth County District
> Court in
>
> Ellsworth, Kansas.1 Gilbert appears to be facing
> prosecution in a
>
> state criminal case (Saline County Case NO. 98-CR-1638),
> and cites
>
> the revocation of his bond and his confinement for
> determination of
>
> END OF PAGE 1
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> ___________________________________________
>
> 1Gilbert also submitted an affidavit of poverty which the
> court
>
> liberally construes as plaintiff's request for leave to
> proceed in
>
> forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
>
> Gilbert's litigation history in federal court renders
> him
>
> subject to the "3-strike" provision in 28 U.S.C.
> § 1915(g), whereby
>
> Gilbert must pay the full district court filing fee in any
> civil
>
> action or appeal submitted while he is a prisoner. See 28
> U.S.C. §
>
> 1915(g)("In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil
> action or appeal
>
> a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this
> section if the
>
> prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while
> incarcerated or
>
> detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a
> court of
>
> the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it
> is
>
> frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which
> relief
>
> may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent
> danger of
>
> serious physical injury.")
>
> Because Gilbert is attempting to remove a state criminal
> action
>
> to federal court, the 3-strike provision in § 1915(g)
> arguably does
>
> not apply. Having reviewed Gilbert's limited financial
> resources,
>
> the court grants Gilbert's motion.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> PAGE 2
>
> his mental competency to stand trial. Gilbert broadly
> claims Kansas
>
> officials, including state and appellate judges, have
> breached their
>
> duty to protect his constitutional rights, and contends he
> is being
>
> denied equal access to a fair and unbiased state tribunal.
>
> The procedure for removal of a state criminal matter to a
>
> federal court is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1446 which
> provides in relevant part that
>
> A defendant ... desiring to remove any ... criminal
>
> prosecution from a State court shall file in the district
>
> court of the United States for the district and division
>
> within which such action is pending a notice of removal
>
> signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil
>
> Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of
>
> the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all
>
> process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant
>
> ... in such action.
>
> 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).
>
> The notice of removal must include all grounds for removal,
> and must be filed within 30 days of a defendant's
> arraignment in the state court, or any time before his
> trial, whichever is earlier.
>
> 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(1)and (2). The filing of a notice of
> removal of a criminal prosecution does not prevent the state
> court from proceeding in the criminal action, but does
> prevent the state court from entering a judgment of
> conviction if the prosecution has not been remanded to the
> state courts. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(3).
>
> This court is to promptly examine any notice of removal
> filed from a state criminal prosecution. 28 U.S.C. §
> 1446(c)(4). Summary remand is to be ordered if it
> "clearly appears on the face of the notice and any
> exhibits annexed thereto that removal should not be
>
> permitted." Id. Otherwise, a prompt evidentiary
> hearing is to be ordered and conducted to determine if
> removal is to be permitted.
>
> 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c)(5).
>
> Having reviewed the materials submitted by defendant
> Gilbert in this matter, the court finds summary remand of
> the criminal prosecution to the state courts is warranted.
>
> Removal of state-court civil or criminal actions to federal
> court is limited to actions against federal officers, 28
> U.S.C. § 1442, members of the armed forces, 28 U.S.C. §
> 1442a, and defendants in certain civil rights actions, 28
> U.S.C. § 1443. The court finds none of these requirements
> are satisfied by a plain and liberal reading of
> Gilbert's pro se notice of removal.
>
> To the extent Gilbert seeks relief from the federal courts
> to prevent the violation of his constitutional rights in his
> pending state criminal proceeding, relief in federal court
> lies in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after first
> exhausting available state court remedies. The summary
> remand entered herein reflects the court's considered
> opinion that removal to federal court is improper, that the
> state courts are fully capable of protecting Gilbert's
> constitutional rights.
>
> IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED that defendant
> Gilbert
>
> is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in seeking
> removal of
>
> his state criminal proceeding to federal court.
>
> IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the
> state
>
> courts.
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> LET ME EDUCATE U ON HOW TO READ A FEDERAL COURT ORDER! THAT
> WHICH FOLLOWS HERE IS CUT FROM THE VERAFIABLE FEDERAL COURT
> ORDER!
>
> The procedure for removal of a state criminal matter to a
>
> federal court is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1446 which
> provides in
>
> relevant part that
>
> A defendant ... desiring to remove any ... criminal
>
> prosecution from a State court shall file in the district
>
> court of the United States for the district and division
>
> within which such action is pending a notice of removal
>
> signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil
>
> Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of
>
> the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all
>
> process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant
>
> ... in such action.
>
> PLEASE NOTE THE DOT'S IN THE ABOVE FEDERAL COURT
> ORDER...........I HAVE NOW ENCLOSED A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
> TEXT TAKEN FROM THE LAW BOOK'S.
> § 1446. Procedure for removal
>
> (a) A defendant or defendants desiring to remove any civil
> action or criminal prosecution from a State court shall file
> in the district court of the United States for the district
> and division within which such action is pending a notice of
> removal signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of
> Civil Procedure and containing a short and plain statement
> of the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all
> process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant or
> defendants in such action.
>
> NOTE THERE IS NO DOT'S...REMEBER IN SCHOOL WE WERE
> INSTRUCTED TO CONECT THE....DOT'S?
>
> I EDUCATE U FURTHER WHAT THIS FEDERAL COURT ORDER
> STATES...read the "MARKS" NOTHING ELSE.
>
> Before the court is a notice of removal filed by a
> defendant in
>
> a pending criminal action in the Ellsworth County District
> Court in Ellsworth, Kansas.1
>
> THE ORDER SPEAKS OF A ELLSWORTH COUNTY DEFENDANT AND THEN
> MENTIONS I'M ON TRIAL IN SALINE COUNTY, KANSAS ----
> EVIDENCE IN THE CASE IS (3) C.D.'s 1ST BY KID ROCK ON
> THE FACE IT STATES "FUCK YOU" 2ND STATES "LET
> ME SEE U GET YOURSELF OUT OF THIS" 3RD STATES
> "STAY HUNGRY!"
>
> SEE: GT VANBEBBER'S FEDERAL COURT ORDER KANSAS CITY ,
> KANSAS US DISTRICT COURT AUGUST 2003 --- IT'S NOT
> READILY AVAILABLE ON THE WEB....IT ORDERS THE ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOE SCHEPACK PROSECUTED.
>
> LET'S GET BACK TO "MARKS" AND READ THIS
> FEDERAL COURT ORDER! LET'S ALSO CONNECT THE DOT'S IN
> THE FEDERAL COURT ORDER.
>
> A DEFENDANT DESIRING TO REMOVE A CRIMINAL IN SUCH ACTION
> NEED'S TO FILE ALL THE GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL "CLEARLY
> APPEARS FROM THE NOTICE AND EXHIBITS ANEXED THERTO THAT
> REMOVAL SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED" id
>
> ID MEANS IN LATIN IN THE BODY
>
> THAT IS ALL THIS FEDERAL COURT ORDER STATES: THE ORDER
> INFORMS THE DEFENDANT STATE OF KANSAS IF IT WANT'S TO
> REMOVE A CRIMINAL FROM IT'S PROSECUTION TO FILE A
> NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS THIS PRO SE LITIGANT DID TO THE FEDERAL
> COURT STATING ALL THE REASONS THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY IS TO BE PROSECUTED IN FEDERAL COURT... THE JUDGE
> THEN TOLD THE STATE OF KANSAS DISTRICT ATTORNEY SALINA,
> KANSAS THAT REMOVAL TO A FEDERAL SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED -
> IT'S IN THE BODY HIS BODY, THAT MAKES ME FEEL BETTER
> THOOUGH WHY IS MY CONVICTIONS STILL NOT OVERTURNED.
>
> AND WHY WAS I HELD 9-MONTHS IN THE LARNED STATE HOSPITAL
> ILLEGALLY - A FACILITY OVERSEEN BY KANSAS GOVENOR KATHLEEN
> SEBELLIUS AND HOW DID I ENTER THAT FACILITY WITH OUT A
> WRITTEN ORDER BY A QUALIFIED MENTAL HEALTH
> PROFESSIONAL...AND AFTER BEING FOUND COMPETENT BY THIS A US
> DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND COMPETENT BY A SALINE COUNTY MENTAL
> HEALTH EXAMINER?
>
> DID THESE PEOPLE ILLEGALLY INCARCERATE ME FOR PURPOSE OF
> HOLDING A TRIAL OF A PUBLIC OFFICIAL W/OUT PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
> --YES THEY DID.
>
> AND IM THE ONE THAT CONTINUALLY PAY'S THE PRICE - I
> DELEATED THIS BLOG - PREVIOUSLY W/ALL FACT'S POSTED
> ----- AS I TRULY BELIEVED THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WOULD
> COMPENSATE ME FOR MY ILLEGAL INCARCERATION......
>
> THEY DID NOT! EVEN THOUGH THEY KNOW THE TRUTH!
>
> _________________________________________-
>
> THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL KNOWS THE TRUTH........
>
>
>
>
>
> THESE PUBLIC OFFICIALS WENT INTO THE LANSING CORRECTIONAL
> FACILITY IN KANSAS AND LOCKED THE FACILITY DOWN FOR THREE
> DAY'S ---- IT WAS MY PAROLE VIOLATORS HEARING FROM MY
> EXTRADITION FROM CALIFORNIA CLAIMING I WAS A FUGITIVE FROM
> JUSTIC..... I WAS NOT A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE PHIL KLINE
> EX- KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL - FILED A MOTION W/ THE FEDERAL
> COURTS OF KANSASA FOR PURPOSE OF OBSTRUCTING ENFORCMENT OF
> FEDERAL LAWS' FILED W/ IN MY PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS
> IN US DISTRICT COURT, TOPEKA, KANSAS.
> § 1581. Peonage; obstructing enforcement
>
> (a) Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of
> peonage, or arrests any person with the intent of placing
> him in or returning him to a condition of peonage, shall be
> fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years,
> or both. If death results from the violation of this
> section, or if the violation includes kidnapping or an
> attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or the attempt to
> commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, the
> defendant shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for
> any term of years or life, or both.
> (b) Whoever obstructs, or attempts to obstruct, or in any
> way interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this
> section, shall be liable to the penalties prescribed in
> subsection (a).
>
> any of u alleged US CITIZENS WISH TO RESPOND OR POST A
> COMMENT ? DO SO AT.
>
> comments@whitehouse.gov
>
>
>
> HIS OFFICE CLAIMED I WAS A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE FOR
> PURPOSE OF HAVING MY HABEAS PETITION DISMISSED AS NO
> FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE CAN HAVE A PENDING CIVIL ACTION IN
> COURT....
>
> NOTE AND I DO MEAN NOTE I HAD LESS THAT 30 DAY'S UNTILL
> MY PAROLE DATE.
>
> NOTE AND I DO MEAN NOTE I WAS EXTRADITED FROM CALIFORNIA ON
> THE GOVENORS LIER JET... NO OTHER PRISONER IN KANSAS HAS
> EVER BEEN EXTRADITED ON THAT PLANE...... AND I DID POINT
> THAT OUT TO THE TWO KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
> OFFICERS WHO HAD WORKED FOR THE DEPARTMENT 13 YEARS AND HAD
> NEVER BEEN ON THAT PLAN NOR EVER HEARD OF A PRISONER BEING
> ON IT..
>
> WHY THE GOVENORS PLANE....I TELL YOU WHY, BIG FAT FING
> COVER-UP......THATS WHY INTENTIONALLY OBSTRUCTING AND
> PREVENTING ENFORCMENT OF FEDERAL LAW's BLANTLY
> ISSUED.....AT JUDGES COPS AND ATTORNIES!
>
> UNENFORCABLE BY THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM...or YOUR US GOVENMENT
> OFFICIALS -- IS TAHT NOT RIGHT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
> JUSTICE.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1:51 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
> Tuesday, September 30, 2008
>
>
> HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO ISSUE AN EXECUTIVE ORDER!
>
> 8 YEARS THIS ILLEGAL EXTRADITION - IMPRISONMENT AND COURT
> CASES HAVE BEEN IN THE COURTS ---------- FOR 4- YEARS THE
> FBI ..... HAS BEEN INFORMED.
>
> CRAIG GILBERT VS. BARRY A. BENNINGTON US DIST. COURT
> TOPEKA, KANSAS
>
> CRAIG GILBERT VS. CHARLES SIMMONS KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
>
> CRAIG GILBERT VS. ELLSWORTH COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER ELLSWORTH
> KANSAS
>
> CRAIG GILBERT VS. NANCY V. IVES UNITED STATES DIST. COURT
> TOPEKA, KANSAS
>
> CRAIG GILBERT VS ROGER WERHOLTZ, SECRETARY KANSAS
> DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS - KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
>
> CRAIG GILBERT VS THE UNITED STATES US DIST. COURT NORTHERN
> DISTRICT OF TEXAS (2000) ALL FOR TOLD AND ALL BECAME
> REALITY..eg , US DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF GT VANBEBBER JUDGE
> (SO SORRY HE DIED) US DISTRICT COURT KANSAS CITY, KANSAS
> AGUST 2003
>
> STATE OF KANSAS VS CRAIG GILBERT US DISTRICT COURT KANSAS
> CITY, KASNAS ( REMOVAL CASE FROM STATE COURT) ELLSWORTH
> COUNTY, KANSAS ---U MUST READ THIS CASE AND SEE ALL EVIDENCE
> SUBMITTED - ORDERING THE ELLSWORTH COPUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
> PROSECUTED( HIS NAME IS JOE SCHEPACK HE IS STILL A DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY IN STAFFORD COUNTY, KANSAS.........IF U NEED HELP
> READING A FEDERAL COURT ORDER BLINDED BY A BUNCH OF BULL
> SHIT WORDS I WILL BE GLAD TO TEACH U..
>
> STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS CRAIG GILBERT SAN BERNADINO COUNTY
> (MAIN COURT HOUSE) CALIFORNIA ------ NOTICE OF REMOVAL FILED
> TO RIVERSIDE US DISTRICT COURT RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
> ALL RELATEDF TO KANSAS - ILLEGALLY EXTRADITED AND HELD IN
> THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS........THEN
> ILLEGALLY EXTRADITED TO KANSAS AFTER THE SAN BERNADINO
> COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA HELD ME TWICE IN EXCESS
> OF 84-DAYS.AND RELEASED ME ----- AND DISMISSED A THIRD PARTY
> CLAIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS CRAIG GILBERT VS. THE STATE OF
> KANSAS........RELEASED FROM CUSTODY BY San bernadino county
> california district court AND THEN EXTRADITED BY RIVERSIDE
> COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ........WISH TO EXPLAIN THIS
> ........US GOVERNMENT? BARRACK OBAMMA MENTIONED RIVERSIDE
> COUNTY CALIFORNIA IN ONE ODF HIS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
> SPEECHES.......ANYONE WANT TO TELL ME WHY?
>
> THERE IS SO MANY CASES IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS THRU -
> OUT THE UNITED STATES ENVOLVING THIS MATTER......
>
> FOR SAKE OF AN EXAMPLE:
>
> US TREASURY EX REL, CRAIG GILBERT
>
> VS
>
> UNITED STAES DISTRICT ATTORNEY (KANSAS ERIC MELGREN)
>
> THE APPEAL TO THE US COURT OF APPEALS DENVER
> COLORADO........10TH CIRCUIT.......MOTION TO RECONSIDER
> REFUSAL TO FILE MY APPEAL CLAIMING I NEEDED TO PAY 350
> DOLLAR FILING FEE'S --------- THE ORDER TCOURT F FILED
> WAS SIGNED BY AN ATTORNEY DISMISSING MY CASE, HOW THE HELL
> DOES AN ATTORNEY SIGN A FEDERAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL IN THE US
> COURT OF APPEALS 10th CIRCUIT..............??????????
>
> ON BEHALF OF THE JUDGES?.............SOME GOVERNMENT
> OFFICIAL WANT TO ANSWER THAT?
>
> FUCK NO - U DO NOT........U CAN NOT ANSWER THAT - DID WE
> APPOINT THE ATTORNEY TO THE FEDERAL BENCH OR A JUDGE ......?
>
> WE CAN GO ON AND ON................WHATS THE POINT
> GEORGE W. BUSH -
>
> THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES THAT SIGNED THESE
> ILLEGAL EXTRADITION PAPERS AND KANSAS GOVENOR BILL GRAVES
> .....EX-KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE.... US DISTRICT
> ATTORNEY ERIC MELGREN.....THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF TRACY
> PLOUTZ AND LORD ONLY KNOWS WHOM ELSE ARE ALL REPUBLICANS
> ............
>
> DO NOT GET ME WRONG, ALL THE JUDGES ARE DEMOCRATS AND LETS
> NOT FORGET THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OF KANSAS ARE ALSO
> DEMOCRATS AND THE GOVENOR OF KANSAS IS A DEMOCRAT...........
>
> THE HEAD OF THE FBI IS REPUBLICAN......
>
> THE HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES IS
> REPUBLICAN................
>
> WHAT THE HELL IT'S ONLY PEOPLE----NOT REGISTERED TO
> VOTE ---- THAT WE ILLEGALLY INCARCERATE --FUCK THEIR
> RIGHT'S - IS THAT NOT TRUE GOVERNMENT...........
>
> GEORGE W. BUSH'S DAUGHTER RECENTLY GOT MARRIED
> ----THEIR FATHER AND DAUGHTER SONG WAS - LOOKING IN TO MY
> BABIES EYE'S .............
>
> GOOD FOR YOU MR. BUSH I WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO LOOK INTO TO
> MY DAUGHTER'S EYES........BECAUSE SOME UNEDUCATED
> POLITICAL OFFICALS SIGNED ILLEGAL EXTRADITION PAPERS AND HAD
> ME ILLEGALLLY INCARCERATED ALL MY FUCKING LIFE............I
> STOOD FOR U .... AND WHAT I GOT IS A BLIND FUCKING DATE W/
> THE JAILS AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM..AT MY EXSPENSE, REMEMBER
> SALINE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 2006............AND DALLAS
> COUNTY JAIL 2008...............
>
> I REALLY BELIEVED U WOULD ORDER THE STATE OF KANSAS TO
> COMPENSATE ME FOR MY ILLEGAL INCARCERATION U DID
> NOT..............
>
> YEAH -- THE SKATE BOARDER CRASHED INTO A BRICK WALL.......
> THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN U DECIDE IT IS TIME TO LIVE OR DIE
> ...........THE BRICK WALL.......
>
> I'M NOT ATTACKING U.....BUT I TELL U THIS ........ I
> WOULD NOT VOTE FOR A REPUBLICAN NOR A DEMOCRAT..........
>
> I COULD CARLESS ABOUT YOUR SPY CAMERAS ---- I COULD
> CARELESS ABOUT ANY POLICY YOU HAVE MADE IT DOES NOT EFFECT
> ME ------ WHAT EFFECTS ME IS YOUR SIGNATURE ON A DOCUMENT
> FILED IN THE DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT ORDERING ME
> RETURNED TO A CONDITION OF PEONAGE IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC
> 1581 AND U WELL AWARE OF IT .. AND FAILING TO RIGHT THE
> WRONG FINANCIALLY.........FOR THREE YEARS U WERE WELL AWARE
> ------- PHILE KLINE UR REPUBLICAN COUNTER PART INFORMED
> U..... THAT IS WHY HE ACTED LIKE A STUPID FOOL AND NOW IM
> SEEKING HIS RESIGNATION,,, FOR OBSTRUCTING ENFORCMENT OF
> FEDERAL LAWS ........ SHOULD HAVE RESOLVED THIS
> MATTER......... INSTEAD OF PLAYING GOD W/ MY
> LIFE................
>
> IN CASE U MISSED IT THIS IS UR ADMINISTRATION!
>
> YOUR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES - YOU EXECUTED MORE
> HUMAN LIVES IN TEXAS THAN ANY OTHER GOVENOR - IS GOD
> SPEAKING TO U TODAY..... THRU ME?
>
> DAMN STRAIGHT HE IS! MY BIRTH DATE IS JUNE 14 FLAG DAY... U
> BELIEVE IN GOD ...... SO U SAY..... BUT DO U?
>
> U SAY U INVADED IRAQ BECAUSE OF THE PEOPLE KILLED THERE BY
> SADDAM ......... YOU SIGNED MY ILLEGAL EXTRADITION PAPERS
> WICH GOT ME ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED FOR 5 + YEARS ..... HOW
> MANY OF THOSE INMATES U ORDERED EXECUTED IN TEXAS WERE
> ACTUALLY INNOCENT?
>
> THINK ABOUT IT - 17 ILLEGAL INCARCERATIONS IN TEXAS SINCE
> 2000 .......... HOW MANY WERE INNOCENT?
>
> U DO NOT KNOW...THOUGH U DO KNOW THIS , U ILLEGALLY
> EXTRADITED ME ON A FATALY DEFECTIVE COMPLAINT
> ..............AND STILL U DO NOTHING OTHER THAN WHAT I SAW
> ---------- AND U INFLICTED MORE PUNISHMENT ON ME - MAKING ME
> FIGHT A BATTLE W/ THE LEGAL SYSTEM! POLITICAL POLITICS.
>
> WHY MR. PRESIDENT?
>
> THEN U FORGOT THE BIGGEST PART ---- FINANCIAL COMPENSATION!
>
> YOU AND YOUR ADMINISTRATION WILL BAIL OUT WALL STREET FOR
> 700 BILLION DOLLARS ------ THOUGH NO-ONE BAILED ME OUT A
> SMALL BUSINESS MAN!!!! NO RATHER THEY YANKED THE RUG OUT
> FROM UNDER NEATH ME AND FALSIFIED POLICE REPORTS CHANGED
> TRANSCRIPTS AND SENT THE LITTLE BUSINESS MAN TO
> PRISON.......
>
> WHERE IS THIS COUNTRY HEADING UNDER THOSE POLICIES RIGHT
> DOWN THE DRAIN AND IN TO A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT THAT IS
> GOING TO BLOW UP IN THE BEASTS FACE........ THAT IS OK
> PREZ.........WHEN U NEED HELP avoiding the chip u stuck in
> my arm ....... I'LL SAVE U.....
>
> SO MR. PRESIDENT ARE U GOING TO RIGHT THIS SITUATION.....
> OR ARE U GOING TO LET MY DAUGHTER BELIEVE THE LIE???
>
> RIGHT IT TODAY! 30 - DAYS AND STILL MR. PRESIDENT YOU HAVE
> NOT RIGHTED THIS SITUATION........WHAT - ANOTHER 8- YEARS IS
> THAT WHAT THE GOVERNMNET NEEDS -------- WHAT DIDN'T THE
> FBI INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER WHEN I CALLED THEM IN
> 2004........4-YEARS MR. PRESIDENT, I KNOW WHAT THE FBI PAPER
> WORK SAY'S..........IT SAYS THE SAME THING AS THIS
> BLOG.....THOUGH MENTIONS A BUNCH OF KANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
> AND SUPREME COURT CASES NOT --- POSTED HERE ... YET!
>
> IS THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION NULL AND VOID....... WE
> THE PEOPLE ARE ABOUT TO FIND OUT!
>
> MR. PRESIDENT
>
>
>
> 1:37 PM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit -
> Remove
>
>
> PEOPLE THAT HAVE RECIEVED A COPY OF THIS BLOG-THROUGH
> VARIFIABLE E-MAIL.
> Current mood: drained
> Category: Web, HTML, Tech
>
> president@whitehouse.gov PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
>
> da@da.sbcounty.gov SAN BERNADINO COUNTY CALIFORNIA
> DISTRICT ATTORNEY
>
> washingtondc.fbi.gov FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATIONS
> WASHINGTON D.C.
>
> kansascity.fbi.gov KANSAS FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATIONS
> KANSAS CITY MO.
>
> sf.nancy@mail.house.gov NANCY PELOSI HOUSE SPEAKER
> WASHINGTON D.C.
>
> KANSAS GOVENOR KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
>
> LA TIMES
>
> NEW YORK TIMES
>
> AND NUMEROUS OTHER KANSAS OFFICIALS..........
>
> IF YOU HAVE A COMMENT OR SUJESTION FOR THESE INDIVIDUALS -
> I PROVIDED THEIR E-MAIL ADDRESS.
>
> YOU CAN E-MAIL ME AT civilrightss@aol.com
>
>
>
> Currently listening :
> Picture
> By Kid Rock
> Release date: 2002-11-12
>