TPM
Citing former U.S. officials and people with close ties to Menendez, The Washington Post reported
Monday that the CIA had obtained credible evidence, including IP
addresses, linking Cuban agents to efforts to disseminate the
prostitution allegations. Menendez's attorney sent a letter to the
Justice Department in April requesting that it pursue that evidence,
further alleging that the Cuban government sought to derail the
senator's political career as he was poised to head up the powerful
Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
The Daily Caller's editor-in-chief, Tucker Carlson, told the Post it
would be difficult to verify whether a story written by one of his
reporters actually originated with the Castro regime.
"I really can't assess it without more information," Carlson told the
newspaper. "It's bizarre on its face, but also fascinating."
A spokesperson for Menendez said she found it "extremely disturbing"
that U.S. intelligence indicated the Cuban government was the source of
the prostitution allegations.
"The Washington Post’s report that the CIA has concluded a foreign
intelligence service sought to manipulate U.S. policy by spreading false
rumors to the FBI and to media outlets is extremely disturbing,"
Menendez communications director Tricia Enright told TPM in an email.
"We hope the Department of Justice and other appropriate federal
agencies will investigate this matter aggressively and hold anyone
involved fully accountable."
Several months after The Daily Caller published its original report, the conservative site sparred with the Washington Post
over the newspaper's debunking of the prostitution allegations. The
Post reported that a woman who said she had sex with Menendez for money
later claimed she was actually paid to fabricate that claim. The Daily
Caller argued that neither of the women it interviewed for its own story
were referenced in the Post's report.
ABC News revealed in the midst of that kerfluffle that that it had also interviewed the two women
who sat for videotaped interviews with The Daily Caller. The network's
Rhonda Schwartz and Brian Ross reported that they "did not broadcast or
initially report on the claims because of doubts about the women's
veracity and identity."
As The Daily Caller's story unraveled, it was also reported that a man named "Carlos"
approached the attorney who arranged interviews with the alleged
prostitutes and claimed he worked for the conservative website. The
attorney claimed "Carlos" offered him $5,000 to find young women to say
they were paid to have sex with the New Jersey Democrat.
The Daily Caller denied
that anyone named "Carlos" went to the Dominican Republic at the
website's behest, and Carlson himself said no one was paid in connection
with the escort story in a statement on his own website. The website
later acknowledged
that a man identifying himself as "Carlos" did in fact serve as the
translator for the interviews on which its original report was based.
The translator was not compensated, The Daily Caller said.
Read the Washington Post's whole report here.
No comments:
Post a Comment