THINK PROGRESS
As ExxonMobil’s CEO, it’s Rex Tillerson’s job to promote the
hydraulic fracturing enabling the recent oil and gas boom, and fight
regulatory oversight. The oil company is the biggest natural gas
producer in the U.S., relying on the controversial drilling technology
to extract it.
The exception is when Tillerson’s $5 million property value might be
harmed. Tillerson has joined a lawsuit that cites fracking’s
consequences in order to block the construction of a 160-foot water
tower next to his and his wife’s Texas home.
The Wall Street Journal
reports the tower would supply water to a nearby fracking site, and the
plaintiffs argue the project would cause too much noise and traffic
from hauling the water from the tower to the drilling site. The water
tower, owned by Cross Timbers Water Supply Corporation, “will sell water
to oil and gas explorers for fracing [sic] shale formations leading to
traffic with heavy trucks on FM 407, creating a noise nuisance and
traffic hazards,” the suit says.
Though Tillerson’s name is on the lawsuit, a lawyer representing him
said his concern is about the devaluation of his property, not fracking
specifically.
When he is acting as Exxon CEO, not a homeowner, Tillerson has lashed
out at fracking critics and proponents of regulation. “This type of
dysfunctional regulation is holding back the American economic recovery,
growth, and global competitiveness,” he said in 2012. Natural gas production “is an old technology just being applied, integrated with some new technologies,” he said in another interview. “So the risks are very manageable.”
In shale regions, less wealthy residents have protested fracking
development for impacts more consequential than noise, including water contamination and cancer risk. Exxon’s oil and gas operations and the resulting spills not only sinks property values, but the spills have leveled homes and destroyed regions.
Exxon, which pays Tillerson a total $40.3 million, is staying out of the legal tangle. A spokesperson told the WSJ it “has no involvement in the legal matter.”
No comments:
Post a Comment