RAW STORY
Fox & Friends segment warned on Tuesday that President
Barack Obama’s administration was set to enact a ban on doughnut
sprinkles, which meant that the government could take control of where
you live and work next.
In a report
that seemed to have no actual news value other than to rile up readers
during the holiday season, Breitbart asserted just days before Christmas
that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had moved to “ban cake” and
“donut ‘sprinkles’.”
“Although the amount of trans fats Americans consume has declined
significantly in recent years, the FDA’s quest to completely eliminate a
particular type of trans fat threatens to eliminate the noble
‘sprinkle,’ used to decorate holiday treats and donuts,” the Breitbart
report said. “Even a small amount of joy is suspect in the FDA’s brave,
new, food-monitored world.”
It’s true that the FDA took steps in 2013 to phase out the sale of artificial trans fats. And the Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that moving forward with a complete ban could prevent as many as 7,000 deaths and 20,000 coronary events each year.
Manufacturers like popcorn maker Redenbacher’s have responded by reformulating their foods to remove trace amounts of trans fats.
In fact, the Paulaur Corporation has already removed trans fats from its line of sprinkles by using a non hydrogenated palm oil.
But Fox News host Clayton Morris told viewers on Tuesday that they
would have to “say goodbye to your favorite sprinkled doughnut.”
“They’re getting rid of doughnuts like these,” Morris explained while
hold a plate of pastries. “Doesn’t the FDA have more important things
to do than regulate sprinkles?”
“Food police” opponent Jayson Lusk argued that there was no need to
ban trans fats because food companies had already reduced the amount
that was used because of new labeling laws.
“What it is also saying to people is, ‘You’re just not responsible,
right?’” Morris opined. “If you can’t eat one of these every other day,
and you know that you’re going to have some other health issues if
you’re eating doughnuts, that’s the main part of your diet, that’s
probably going to have some issues, what the government is saying is,
‘Look, you’re not responsible for your own health so we’re going to step
in and make sure we’re going to be responsible for you.’”
“You know, there’s a tendency to look at this policy and say, ‘What’s
the big deal? You know, a ban on sprinkles on donuts, it’s just not
that big of deal,’” Lusk replied. “But I think the way you want to look
at that is to say that, you know, if the government can involve itself
in such small minutia decisions of our daily lives as to whether we want
to eat sprinkles or not, you know, that’s really not much respect for
the citizens’ choices.”
“And if they’re willing to ban those small decisions, you know, what
kind of respect will they give citizens in the large decisions in lives
about where to work or where to live or some of the things that really
matter?” he continued.
Morris went on to say that the government would also be banning
crackers, frozen pizza, popcorn, coffee creamers and canned frosting.
“If you’re making some cookies once a year with your kids on the
holidays, that will be banned,” Morris remarked, wondering if the
government could have some “common sense” and make exceptions for tasty
foods.
Lusk said that his children agreed that the policy was “just dumb.”
“We should have kids running government,” Morris quipped................
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Samuel Adams, (1722-1803)
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Thursday, December 25, 2014
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Monday, December 22, 2014
Saturday, December 20, 2014
Polls show shift in favor of US-Cuba relations
THE HILL
President
Obama’s move to normalize relations with Cuba on Wednesday sparked
fierce debate, but polling shows he’s on the right side of public
opinion.
Two polls released this year show a broad shift among Cuban-Americans in Florida and Americans nationally in favor of diplomatic relations with Cuba.
A Florida International University poll of Cuban-Americans from June found that a strong majority — 68 percent — favors reestablishing diplomatic relations with the island country, and 69 percent favor lifting travel restrictions.
The same poll from 2004 found that only 39 percent of Cuban-Americans favored reestablishing diplomatic ties with Cuba, with 52 percent in opposition. In 1993, the same poll found that 80 percent favored the policy of no diplomatic ties with Cuba.
In addition, 52 percent of Cuban-Americans now oppose the U.S. trade embargo, with 71 percent saying it hasn’t worked. The same poll from 2004 found that strong majority — 59 percent — in favor of continuing the trade restrictions. In 1993, 85 percent favored tightening the embargo.The trends among Cuban-Americans in Florida mirror how voters nationally view U.S. policy toward Cuba.
An Atlantic Council poll from February found that 56 percent are in favor of normalizing relations with Cuba, including 62 percent of Hispanics nationwide. That support crossed both parties, with 60 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans favoring normalized relations.
Gallup’s polling from the last 17 years shows a steady increase in American perceptions of Cuba. While 57 percent still have a negative view of the country, compared to 38 percent with a positive view, in 2006 those numbers stood at 71 percent negative and 21 percent positive.
Still, the politics of U.S.-Cuba relations are complicated. Sixty-three percent of Cuban-Americans say the country should remain on the State Department’s list of countries that sponsor terrorism, according to the university poll.
And while President Obama has strong support from Hispanics nationally, he failed to win the Cuban-American vote in both 2008 and 2012.
The university survey of 1,000 Cuban-Americans living in Miami-Dade County has a 3.1 percentage point margin of error.
The Atlantic Council poll of 1,024 U.S. adults was conducted Jan. 7-22 and has 3.1-point margin of error.
Two polls released this year show a broad shift among Cuban-Americans in Florida and Americans nationally in favor of diplomatic relations with Cuba.
A Florida International University poll of Cuban-Americans from June found that a strong majority — 68 percent — favors reestablishing diplomatic relations with the island country, and 69 percent favor lifting travel restrictions.
The same poll from 2004 found that only 39 percent of Cuban-Americans favored reestablishing diplomatic ties with Cuba, with 52 percent in opposition. In 1993, the same poll found that 80 percent favored the policy of no diplomatic ties with Cuba.
In addition, 52 percent of Cuban-Americans now oppose the U.S. trade embargo, with 71 percent saying it hasn’t worked. The same poll from 2004 found that strong majority — 59 percent — in favor of continuing the trade restrictions. In 1993, 85 percent favored tightening the embargo.The trends among Cuban-Americans in Florida mirror how voters nationally view U.S. policy toward Cuba.
An Atlantic Council poll from February found that 56 percent are in favor of normalizing relations with Cuba, including 62 percent of Hispanics nationwide. That support crossed both parties, with 60 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans favoring normalized relations.
Gallup’s polling from the last 17 years shows a steady increase in American perceptions of Cuba. While 57 percent still have a negative view of the country, compared to 38 percent with a positive view, in 2006 those numbers stood at 71 percent negative and 21 percent positive.
Still, the politics of U.S.-Cuba relations are complicated. Sixty-three percent of Cuban-Americans say the country should remain on the State Department’s list of countries that sponsor terrorism, according to the university poll.
And while President Obama has strong support from Hispanics nationally, he failed to win the Cuban-American vote in both 2008 and 2012.
The university survey of 1,000 Cuban-Americans living in Miami-Dade County has a 3.1 percentage point margin of error.
The Atlantic Council poll of 1,024 U.S. adults was conducted Jan. 7-22 and has 3.1-point margin of error.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)