"I've my AK in my bed. If I hear that door kick, it's going boom,
boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I'm just going to start putting them
through the (expletive) wall," he told an undercover FBI employee in
July, according to the affidavit unsealed Wednesday.
Novak was charged with committing fraud in connection with
identification documents. He was in federal custody Wednesday and
unavailable for comment. His father has an unlisted number, and attempts
to reach him were unsuccessful. The federal defender's office has the
case, but an attorney had not been selected to represent him by
Wednesday evening.
According to an FBI affidavit, Novak was an active duty soldier and
intelligence analyst with the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg from
Feb. 26, 2009, to Sept. 3, 2012. He also served in active duty in Iraq
in 2010. Novak is currently a human intelligence analyst with the
Minnesota National Guard.
In late January, he went to a training camp in Utah and there met two
undercover FBI employees who posed as members of a Utah-based militia,
according to the affidavit. It also said Novak told the undercover
employees that he took classified materials from Fort Bragg and that he
would share the materials with them.
The undercover employees met Novak in Minnesota in July, and he gave
them an electronic copy of classified documents and taught them how to
encrypt files, the affidavit said. He also said that he had a personnel
roster — including names, birthdates and Social Security numbers — of a
"Battalion's-worth of people" from his former unit.
The undercover employees said they wanted that information and knew
someone who could make fake IDs, which Novak said he needed for his
militia. On Nov. 4, Novak sent the information for 44 individuals to an
undercover FBI employee. On Nov. 25, he accepted $2,000 and said he had
additional pages to sell, the affidavit said.
Lt. Col. Kevin Olson, spokesman for the Minnesota National Guard,
said the guard is aware of the charges, and is cooperating with the FBI
investigation.
Lt. Col. Virginia McCabe, spokeswoman for the 82nd Airborne Division, said the unit will work with the appropriate authorities.
The affidavit also sheds light on some of Novak's militia activities.
In September, Novak and members of his militia group conducted a
military-style field training exercise in rural Minnesota.
On one occasion, a man went to a storage unit with Novak and saw six
"flak vests" that belonged to the 82nd Airborne Division. The affidavit
alleged Novak stole the vests when unit members left them unattended.
Novak had also previously given 10 flak jackets to members of his
militia, the affidavit said.
He told the man with him that he also had camouflage netting and riot gear and intended to start burying caches of equipment.
The complaint and affidavit were initially sealed because Novak had
made several statements that suggest he might flee or resort to
violence.
In July, he allegedly spoke to an undercover employee about escape
routes and said he would barricade himself in his apartment and call "my
guys" to come help. He also said that he had "5000 rounds, a thousand
of it is in magazines, ready to go," the affidavit said.
Novak also told the undercover employee that he sleeps with guns and
was ready to shoot through the wall, the affidavit said, and has weapons
hiding throughout the state.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Samuel Adams, (1722-1803)
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
Metallica - Carol of the Bells
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Tea Party Patriot arrested for swapping child porn using ‘h*rnypastor’ email account
RAW STORY
A 46-year-old Michigan member of the group Tea Party Patriots was named Tuesday in a criminal complaint on charges of distributing and receiving illicit photos and video of children. According to The Smoking Gun, Brian Schwanke is accused of using the email account “h*rnypastor@outlook.com” to send and receive hundreds of provocative images of underage children.
TSG detailed how as recently as last week, Schwanke was ranting on his Facebook page about President Barack Obama’s behavior during a portion of the funeral for South Africa’s Nelson Mandela.
The image of Obama posing for a “selfie” next to the Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt seemed to particularly rile Schwanke.
“What a classy president we have,” he wrote. “His wife has to sit between him to make ‘lil Barry’ behave.”
Schwanke’s profile — which has now been either deleted or made private — proclaimed that the U.S. “WAS founded on a CHRISTIAN foundation, and the progressive, atheist left is running us into the ground to create a Socialist country that will fall like all the others.”
In spite of his straitlaced, conservative public persona, however, Schwanke was posing online as a pastor and youth minister with less-than-holy intentions toward the young girls of his flock.
In the persona of “h*rnypastor,” Schwanke claimed to have been a youth minister for 20 years, telling one correspondent, “with my pool at my house I find lots of chances to ‘counsel’ the girls.”
He was netted by Australian undercover police conducting an online sting. The Australian authorities reported Schwanke to U.S. officials, who raided his home in August.
Schwanke was in possession of a vast trove of illegal images. According to court documents, nearly every email in the “h*rnypastor” account contained images or accounts of child exploitation and abuse.
TSG said that no evidence exists to support Schwanke’s claims of being a pastor. His LinkedIn page identified him as an emergency medical services worker. He is an avid Civil War re-enactor, who, when he isn’t online railing against “feminazis,” enjoys giving “talks to school groups about the American Civil War.”
A 46-year-old Michigan member of the group Tea Party Patriots was named Tuesday in a criminal complaint on charges of distributing and receiving illicit photos and video of children. According to The Smoking Gun, Brian Schwanke is accused of using the email account “h*rnypastor@outlook.com” to send and receive hundreds of provocative images of underage children.
TSG detailed how as recently as last week, Schwanke was ranting on his Facebook page about President Barack Obama’s behavior during a portion of the funeral for South Africa’s Nelson Mandela.
The image of Obama posing for a “selfie” next to the Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt seemed to particularly rile Schwanke.
“What a classy president we have,” he wrote. “His wife has to sit between him to make ‘lil Barry’ behave.”
Schwanke’s profile — which has now been either deleted or made private — proclaimed that the U.S. “WAS founded on a CHRISTIAN foundation, and the progressive, atheist left is running us into the ground to create a Socialist country that will fall like all the others.”
In spite of his straitlaced, conservative public persona, however, Schwanke was posing online as a pastor and youth minister with less-than-holy intentions toward the young girls of his flock.
In the persona of “h*rnypastor,” Schwanke claimed to have been a youth minister for 20 years, telling one correspondent, “with my pool at my house I find lots of chances to ‘counsel’ the girls.”
He was netted by Australian undercover police conducting an online sting. The Australian authorities reported Schwanke to U.S. officials, who raided his home in August.
Schwanke was in possession of a vast trove of illegal images. According to court documents, nearly every email in the “h*rnypastor” account contained images or accounts of child exploitation and abuse.
TSG said that no evidence exists to support Schwanke’s claims of being a pastor. His LinkedIn page identified him as an emergency medical services worker. He is an avid Civil War re-enactor, who, when he isn’t online railing against “feminazis,” enjoys giving “talks to school groups about the American Civil War.”
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Ethics investigation against Georgia governor reportedly turns into criminal probe
RAW STORY
The investigation into alleged campaign finance violations by Georgia’s Republican Gov. Nathan Deal has deepened into a criminal probe as the outlines of a broad cover-up emerged this week.
Some Georgia Democrats believe that the politician known in the state as “Teflon Deal” for his ability to elude punishment for ethics violations may finally be getting his due.
“We’re past an ethics complaint,” said Bryan Long of Better Georgia to Raw Story. “This is not an ethics investigation. When the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office issue subpoenas, this is a criminal investigation.”
In 2011, shortly after he took office, Gov. Deal was hit with charges that he had personally enriched himself on campaign funds. In 2010, Deal and his family allegedly helped themselves to at least $322,000 in campaign donations, paying generous stipends to companies that they own or have an interest in.
In June, word reached the governor that subpoenas were being prepared by a five-member ethics panel — appointed by the governor himself — charged with investigating the shady deals. Gov. Deal promptly fired one member of the ethics office staff and gutted the salary of another.
He then appointed his own head to the investigation and now claims in interviews that he has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
A grand jury empaneled in Atlanta may disagree with that assessment.
“He keeps saying all of this has been cleared,” Long said. “No one has ever looked at this other than people who he has appointed himself. He’s never been cleared of any of these charges.”
Last week, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that at least five current and former members of Georgia’s state ethics committee have been issued subpoenas by the FBI as part of the grand jury investigation. The grand jury will re-convene in January to look at documents which purportedly show the role Deal’s office played in squelching any and all attempts to investigate the governor’s allegedly crooked financial dealings.
Deal’s attorney Randy Evans told the Journal-Constitution that no one in the governor’s office has received a subpoena or even a phone call on the probe. These new subpoenas, he insisted, don’t “involve anything to do with the governor.”
Long pointed out that investigations of cover-ups typically “work from the outside in” and that “the next round of subpoenas could be aimed at the governor’s office.”
“But maybe,” he said sarcastically, “they’re just a bunch of liars working on the state ethics committee and Gov. Deal will be cleared.”
“Let’s remember that we’re talking about computer records,” he continued. “If the FBI is able to turn up any documentation of a crime, there will be an indictment. It’s not a ‘he said-she said’ argument. There was money that changed hands, there were records that were kept. There are emails back and forth.”
“There’s clearly a pattern,” said Long. “There were charges of corruption against him when he was in Congress, there were charges of corruption in his last campaign. There have been constant charges of corruption literally since the day after he was elected.”
DuBose Porter, chairman of the Democratic Party of Georgia said in a statement via email, “The same behavior that forced Nathan Deal to resign from Congress has now shown up in the way he conducts his administration as Governor. The issue of federal subpoenas is troubling. Every Georgian should pay close attention so that history does not repeat itself in the ethics commission.”
Nathan Deal resigned from Congress on March 21, 2010 after being accused of using his office to personally enrich himself through a series of business deals.
Democrats in the state hope to successfully challenge Deal in 2014. State Sen. Jason Carter announced earlier this month that he intends to run in the Democratic primary race for the governorship. Carter is the grandson of former Pres. Jimmy Carter.
The investigation into alleged campaign finance violations by Georgia’s Republican Gov. Nathan Deal has deepened into a criminal probe as the outlines of a broad cover-up emerged this week.
Some Georgia Democrats believe that the politician known in the state as “Teflon Deal” for his ability to elude punishment for ethics violations may finally be getting his due.
“We’re past an ethics complaint,” said Bryan Long of Better Georgia to Raw Story. “This is not an ethics investigation. When the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office issue subpoenas, this is a criminal investigation.”
In 2011, shortly after he took office, Gov. Deal was hit with charges that he had personally enriched himself on campaign funds. In 2010, Deal and his family allegedly helped themselves to at least $322,000 in campaign donations, paying generous stipends to companies that they own or have an interest in.
In June, word reached the governor that subpoenas were being prepared by a five-member ethics panel — appointed by the governor himself — charged with investigating the shady deals. Gov. Deal promptly fired one member of the ethics office staff and gutted the salary of another.
He then appointed his own head to the investigation and now claims in interviews that he has been cleared of any wrongdoing.
A grand jury empaneled in Atlanta may disagree with that assessment.
“He keeps saying all of this has been cleared,” Long said. “No one has ever looked at this other than people who he has appointed himself. He’s never been cleared of any of these charges.”
Last week, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that at least five current and former members of Georgia’s state ethics committee have been issued subpoenas by the FBI as part of the grand jury investigation. The grand jury will re-convene in January to look at documents which purportedly show the role Deal’s office played in squelching any and all attempts to investigate the governor’s allegedly crooked financial dealings.
Deal’s attorney Randy Evans told the Journal-Constitution that no one in the governor’s office has received a subpoena or even a phone call on the probe. These new subpoenas, he insisted, don’t “involve anything to do with the governor.”
Long pointed out that investigations of cover-ups typically “work from the outside in” and that “the next round of subpoenas could be aimed at the governor’s office.”
“But maybe,” he said sarcastically, “they’re just a bunch of liars working on the state ethics committee and Gov. Deal will be cleared.”
“Let’s remember that we’re talking about computer records,” he continued. “If the FBI is able to turn up any documentation of a crime, there will be an indictment. It’s not a ‘he said-she said’ argument. There was money that changed hands, there were records that were kept. There are emails back and forth.”
“There’s clearly a pattern,” said Long. “There were charges of corruption against him when he was in Congress, there were charges of corruption in his last campaign. There have been constant charges of corruption literally since the day after he was elected.”
DuBose Porter, chairman of the Democratic Party of Georgia said in a statement via email, “The same behavior that forced Nathan Deal to resign from Congress has now shown up in the way he conducts his administration as Governor. The issue of federal subpoenas is troubling. Every Georgian should pay close attention so that history does not repeat itself in the ethics commission.”
Nathan Deal resigned from Congress on March 21, 2010 after being accused of using his office to personally enrich himself through a series of business deals.
Democrats in the state hope to successfully challenge Deal in 2014. State Sen. Jason Carter announced earlier this month that he intends to run in the Democratic primary race for the governorship. Carter is the grandson of former Pres. Jimmy Carter.
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Thursday, December 12, 2013
How to stick it to the poor: A congressional strategy
By Samantha Paige Rosen
The 113th Congress has stuck it to the poor at pretty much
every opportunity. In fact, if you take all their past and future plans
into account, it looks like they have accomplished that rare feat: To
close in on enacting an overarching, radical agenda without control of
the Senate or the presidency. How did they do it? Probably by escaping
scrutiny through a piecemeal approach to legislation, a president who is
willing to meet them halfway, and one diabolic word: Sequester.
Let's drill down into each piece:
1. Kick 'em to the curbCongress
will basically start kicking poor people out of their homes early next
year. The idea is, if you can't pay for your home without government
assistance, you don't deserve to live in one. In this spirit, budget
cuts due to sequestration will take rental assistance vouchers away from
140,000
low-income families by the beginning of next year, making housing more
expensive as agencies raise costs to offset the budget cuts. All in all,
about three million disabled seniors and families will be affected. The
savings? $2 billion, which is pretty much what the government shutdown
cost in back-pay to federal workers.
If you're lucky enough to keep your home, don't expect to heat it. Sequester cuts to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) meant that 300,000 low-income families in 2013 were denied government support for energy costs.
2. Take the food out of their mouths. Literally.The recent reduction in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits has affected more than 47 million Americans and is the largest wholesale cut in the program since Congress passed the first Food Stamps Act in 1964.
The
cuts to Food Stamps were implemented on November 1. Yet, Congress won't
let the program rest there — House Republicans are pushing to take $39 billion
from SNAP over the next decade. If their plan succeeds, the
Congressional Budget Office estimates that 3.8 million low-income
individuals would lose their benefits in 2014 with 2.8 million more
getting kicked off the program each year. SNAP is one of the three most
effective anti-poverty programs the government has, keeping four million
people out of poverty last year alone. So the initial and further cuts
make a lot of sense — if you despise the poor.
And
don't worry, other cuts to food programs ensure both the oldest and
youngest amongst us won't be spared. Cuts to Meals on Wheels will cost
poor seniors four to 18 million meals
next year. Meanwhile, the Women, Infants, and Children program (WIC),
which provides health care referrals and nutrition to poor pregnant and
postpartum women and children up to age five, has grappled with $500 million in cuts this year and faces even deeper ones next. Fair's fair, though.
3. Dim their kids' futureThere's
nothing that will make our economic future brighter than
under-educating our children, right? That's why, again as a result of
sequestration, Head Start literally had to kick preschoolers out of
their classrooms this March and removed 57,000
children from the program this September (70,000 kids total are will be
affected). If this weren't enough, more than half of public schools
have fired personnel due to the ominous cuts — and Representative Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said sequestration "has been one of the good things that has happened." Given that 40 percent
of children who don't receive early childhood education are more likely
to become a parent as a teenager, 25 percent are more likely to drop
out of school, and 70 percent are more likely to be arrested for a
violent crime, this is definitely the definition of a "good thing."
4. Erase the roadmap for employmentThe
United States has one of the stingiest unemployment programs in the
developed world and it is getting even stingier. People who have been
out of work for 27 weeks or more — 40 percent of the unemployed — have
already begun and will continue to lose a large portion of their
benefits between January and March. Eight percent
of this year's sequestration cuts are coming from unemployment
insurance. The logic here is that the program discourages people from
looking for work, so why fund something that just makes the unemployed
lazier? The evidence, however, proves that government assistance fuels the job searches of these 4.4 million Americans. Yet by the end of December,
about 1.3 million will lose their extended jobless benefits if Congress
doesn't renew the program. And cuts to the Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families program (TANF, or welfare) means there will be even less
of safety net to fall back on.
5. Make 'em work till they dropPresident Obama put Social Security cuts in his budget for fiscal year 2014,
and Republicans are thrilled. Switching to a new formula called Chained
CPI would lead to benefit cuts of $230 billion dollars in the next ten
years. Apparently, it's Social Security that's driving up the debt, as
Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) has said. The irony here, according to The New York Times' Paul Krugman,
is that while debt can indirectly make us poor if deficits drive up
interest rates and discourage productive investment (they haven't),
investment is low because the economy is so weak, partly from
cutbacks in public spending and investment — the cuts, such as this one,
that supposedly protect Americans from a future of excessive debt.
Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren
(Mass.) and Tom Harkin (Iowa) have been fighting an uphill battle to
boost Social Security benefits. But carry on, Congress. What you're
doing really makes sense here.
In just a few short
decades, we've gone from LBJ's Great Society, where many of these ideas
originated, to this Congress' attacks on the poor. According to the Census Bureau,
safety net programs keep tens of millions of Americans out of poverty
each year. But that's just not the federal government's priority
anymore. This Congress' message: It's every man for himself.
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
China state media under fire for arguing benefits of smog
(Reuters) - Commentaries by two of China's most influential news outlets suggesting that the country's air pollution crisis was not without a silver lining drew a withering reaction on Tuesday from internet users and other media.
In online commentaries on Monday, state broadcaster CCTV and the widely read tabloid the Global Times, published by the Communist Party's official People's Daily, both tried to put a positive spin on China's smog problem.
The Global Times said smog could be useful in military situations, as it could hinder the use of guided missiles, while CCTV listed five "unforeseen rewards" for smog, including helping Chinese people's sense of humor.
While both pieces have since been deleted from their websites, Chinese newspapers lost little time in denouncing their point of view, in an unusual case of state media criticizing other state media, showing the scale of the anger.
"Is the smog supposed to lift if we laugh about it?" wrote the Beijing Business Today, published by the city government's official Beijing Daily. "Smog affects our breathing. We hope it does not affect our thinking."
The Dongguan Times, from a heavily industrial city close to the border with Hong Kong, said CCTV's comments were so bizarre people did not know "whether to laugh or cry".
"There's nothing funny about the health dangers of smog," it wrote.
Even the main Xinhua news agency - which had initially picked up CCTV's commentary - weighed in, writing on one of its official microblogs late on Monday that it was "totally inappropriate" to make fun of air pollution.
Air quality in cities is of increasing concern to China's stability-obsessed leaders, anxious to douse potential unrest as a more affluent urban population turns against a growth-at-all-costs economic model that has poisoned much of the country's air, water and soil.
The top U.S. environmental regulator, on a visit to Beijing, said that China was trying to deal with the same sort of problems the United States once faced.
"We have to acknowledge that significant pollution challenges are being faced today in China," Environmental Protection Agency administrator Gina McCarthy told students at Tsinghua University. "The thing is, not too long ago, the U.S. faced similar challenges."
She made no concrete suggestions for sharing technology as her Chinese counterpart, Ministry for Environmental Protection head Zhou Shengxian, had urged on Monday.
Large parts of eastern China, including the country's prosperous and cosmopolitan commercial capital Shanghai, have been covered in a thick pall of smog over the past week or so, though Beijing's normally filthy air has been relatively clear.
Users of Sina Weibo, China's answer to Twitter, also vented their outrage over the CCTV and Global Times' comments.
"The smog crisis covering large parts of China has revealed the failure of the government's development strategy of only going after GDP (growth). CCTV is shameless in trying to cover up for their masters," wrote Wu Bihu, a professor at the elite Peking University.
"The Global Times thinks that pollution will cause missiles to miss their targets ... How shameful! So that's what all this smog has really been about. People had thought it was just bad pollution...," state television in the eastern province of Shandong wrote on one of its microblogs.
(Reporting by Ben Blanchard, Huang Yan and Natalie Thomas; Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore and Nick Macfie)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)